The "furthermore" section of the BKA written appeal remains very interesting IMO.
CB do know police have his camera and cards and photos on usb pens. No need for the police to pretend that they don't have them and CB knows better than anyone what content were on those drives.
In that scenario though, you are making the assumption that CB has to know the police have the content. He doesn't. Given he took measures to bury other USB devices to conceal his *advertiser censored* stash, IF such media did exist, it's almost certain he would have done something similar with it. He may have buried it somewhere else, for example another property he lived at, and doesn't realise the police have found it. Alternatively, they may have come across a video during the recent pedo ring busts, and there is something within the video that gives an indication of it being CB, but not conclusively enough to fully identify him.But if police were to found those photos there would be no need to hide (the fact) from the public. CB would know that his USB sticks and memory cards are already with police so if CB do have photos of abuse of victims he know (not downloaded from the net) then CB knows that police do have that content. In other words German prosecutor shouldn't be afraid of CB knowing what evidences they have on him as CB would already know.
I've had a hunch from the start that CB's possible involvement came about from uncovering a pedo ring. JMOIn that scenario though, you are making the assumption that CB has to know the police have the content. He doesn't. Given he took measures to bury other USB devices to conceal his *advertiser censored* stash, IF such media did exist, it's almost certain he would have done something similar with it. He may have buried it somewhere else, for example another property he lived at, and doesn't realise the police have found it. Alternatively, they may have come across a video during the recent pedo ring busts, and there is something within the video that gives an indication of it being CB, but not conclusively enough to fully identify him.
As for not needing to hide it from the public... until such time they are ready to charge him, something that big a bombshell would never be revealed to the public. It would cause an absolute storm in the media and put massive pressure on them to charge. Doesn't help them one bit if they were to reveal that now.
I've made this argument as well.
The usual reasons for secrecy are to keep the accused from destroying evidence, or to protect witnesses.
We know CB can't destroy any evidence because he is in jail. Also, HCW is hardly being secretive - he is doing lots of interviews to announce his secret evidence. Personally I don't buy the idea he is trying to hide it from CB. And if anyone else out there has digital evidence, they now know to destroy it.
Since the appeal appears to be over, I think he is targeting witnesses in the UK. This is why I find it interesting that the MCs responded to the BBC interview. As discussed with @SuperdadV8 - are the tapas his real media target now?
So they know something that is key to what happened?
Or they've said something in their witness statements that throws doubt on it happening. A mistake about times for me exampleI've made this argument as well.
The usual reasons for secrecy are to keep the accused from destroying evidence, or to protect witnesses.
We know CB can't destroy any evidence because he is in jail. Also, HCW is hardly being secretive - he is doing lots of interviews to announce his secret evidence. Personally I don't buy the idea he is trying to hide it from CB. And if anyone else out there has digital evidence, they now know to destroy it.
Since the appeal appears to be over, I think he is targeting witnesses in the UK. This is why I find it interesting that the MCs responded to the BBC interview. As discussed with @SuperdadV8 - are the tapas his real media target now?
So they know something that is key to what happened?
Interesting report about an abduction, abuse and attempted murder of a 6 year old girl in germany.
The suspect snatched the girl out of her room of a flat in the first floor, while the parents had been in another room at the same time. I assume, that must have happened in night time, because the suspect had thrown the girl into a nearby river in the morning and is said to abused her before.
Entführung Halle: Mutmaßlicher Kinderfänger kommt vor den Haftrichter
So it seems to be not that difficult, to abduct a child out of an apartment or flat if carefully planned, even if it isn't alone there at that time.
Yes, nobody enjoys answering such calls. So for somebody at the OC to dial the Swansea number and speak for 50+ seconds seems a bit weird to me. I shouldn't go down these rabbit holes to be honest. XAccording to those sources it was simply explained as one of those annoying junk phonecall companies.
God yeah, I forgot this case until recently. Wasn't he high on drink and drugs too, something which I think in CBs case seems to trigger episodes of impulsive behaviour to the extreme. On the Mcanns 'bizarre' comment - have they actually said this... If so, why would they believe it to be Bizarre if it has a chance to throwaway the key on this guy. It does seem rather defensive and maybe it's because they're scared of threat of what FF will argue if it comes to trial, that the only possibility for abduction was not from an intruder."To prevent the kidnapped girl from sounding the alarm, Sebastian L. Emy is said to have pretended that the parents knew. He told Emy he was taking her to another girl who would play with her."
Ba*****
In the case of AMcP and AC something similar happened.
Alesha MacPhail murder: Life sentence for Aaron Campbell after he admits guilt
"In his sentencing statement, Lord Matthews said Campbell had carried *advertiser censored* to a secluded spot where he raped and murdered her "in the most brutal fashion".
"He told the teenager: "You said that *advertiser censored* was drowsy and became a bit more awake when you went out.
"At one point she asked who you were and where you were going.
"You said you were a friend of her father and that you were taking her home."
"Campbell gave *advertiser censored* his coat because she was cold."
For any legal experts on here...
Could CB be tried in the UK if evidence given to UK authorities ?
MM was a UK citizen ..would that allow this ?
Have heard double jeopardy rules less strict in UK.
Or if a trial in Germany lets him go free , can the UK authorities then make a case for another trial in UK ?
Since the appeal appears to be over, I think he is targeting witnesses in the UK. This is why I find it interesting that the MCs responded to the BBC interview. As discussed with @SuperdadV8 - are the tapas his real media target now?
So they know something that is key to what happened?
Easily explained like this: JJe sees missed call from UK thinks might be important so phones it and discovers it is only one of those telemarketing co's.Yes, nobody enjoys answering such calls. So for somebody at the OC to dial the Swansea number and speak for 50+ seconds seems a bit weird to me. I shouldn't go down these rabbit holes to be honest. X
Excerpt from the official appeal on the BKA website June 2020:Do you have a link to it? It's not on the first page of the thread