That wouldn't end discussion though, there's a bunch of us who wouldn't agree with the verdict. Imo if they had strong evidence re: Madeleine they'd have charged him already. So they may eventually convict him but the evidence will be weak, as it is in many other convictions in cases being discussed on WS. There's folks still discussing and writing books about the Lindbergh case, in 1932. Discussion about this case will continue. Questions will continue to be asked.Agree & disagree (if that makes sense). I agree that the person responsible will be the only person who knows everything that happened.
But I disagree that the BKA don’t know the truth. They’ve uncovered evidence that the man who confessed to the crime comitted the crime.
IMO they know he’s the killer & the BKA have uncovered that’s the truth. But it’s possible that they may never have all the facts. The unsettling & devastating likelihood is that what happened is exactly what he bragged about in his Skype chat. Which is that he abducted, assaulted & killed a female toddler.
IMO they’ll certainly get a conviction but it may well be without any forensic evidence