Malaysia airlines plane may have crashed 239 people on board #11

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let all put on our thinking/ memory caps! Other than the plane has vanished can anyone come up with ONE thing I am serious, that has been reported and not been denied or turned around . I flunked anyone else

It is mirroring schizophrenia.
 
My current theory:

Pilot enters flight plan for Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in the FMC and the plane takes off following that flight plan. The pilot also enters a second "backup" fight plan into the FMC that would take them to a closer airport for emergency landing if necessary. The second plan was entered sometime before ACARS transmitted at 1:07am, explaining why the u-turn was programmed prior to "All right, good night". Shortly after last voice contact with the cockpit, SHTF and pilots switch to the emergency landing flight plan. Perhaps a fire broke out, disabling the transponder, ACARS, and maybe even other systems. Pilots become incapacitated. The plane reaches the last programmed waypoint and, without pilots to initiate landing, the plane continues on it's current heading until running out of fuel and crashing.
 
Ok we are going to do a little healing here ............I want you to watch the ocean and imagine your swimming in it and your nose is clearing

ready dive (and hey you may be the only survivor if your under water at the right time)!!

LOL Hey it worked :loveyou:
 
Interesting. If some of that equipment was onboard/in the cargo bay, esp. magnetic sensors, I wonder if that could interfere with navigation equipment?

Never mind, I have not been keeping up, that's probably not where you were going with that!

It still makes me wonder if someone got in the cargo area and not through normal check-ins (ie: Iranians).

And, what are they waiting for? To scare and put fear into everyone? :banghead:
 
Let all put on our thinking/ memory caps! Other than the plane has vanished can anyone come up with ONE thing I am serious, that has been reported and not been denied or turned around . I flunked anyone else

It is mirroring schizophrenia.

Um not really. I'm kerfuffled :scared:
 
My current theory:

Pilot enters flight plan for Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in the FMC and the plane takes off following that flight plan. The pilot also enters a second "backup" fight plan into the FMC that would take them to a closer airport for emergency landing if necessary. The second plan was entered sometime before ACARS transmitted at 1:07am, explaining why the u-turn was programmed prior to "All right, good night". Shortly after last voice contact with the cockpit, SHTF and pilots switch to the emergency landing flight plan. Perhaps a fire broke out, disabling the transponder, ACARS, and maybe even other systems. Pilots become incapacitated. The plane reaches the last programmed waypoint and, without pilots to initiate landing, the plane continues on it's current heading until running out of fuel and crashing.

Problem is that if the fire took out the communication it'd also take out the auto pilot.
It's just not feasible that a plane with incapacitated pilots and communication would fly that long.
The auto pilot would also be taken out shortly after the communication and it would crash. :twocents:

Swissair 111 is a great example of what happens with a fire that takes out communication.
 
Avoiding radar via “cloaking technology” has long been one of the objectives of the defence industry and Freescale has been active developing chips for military radar.


Last June it announced it was creating a team of specialists dedicated to producing “radio frequency power products” for the defence industry.


And on March 3, it announced it was releasing 11 of these new gadgets for use in “high frequency, VHF and low-band UHF radar and radio communications”.


20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems

Freescale Semiconductor, which makes powerful microchips for industries including defence, released the powerful new products to the American market on March 3.

Freescale’s spokesman Mitch Haws has said: “These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people.

Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.

<snip>

[/url]

BBM ~ Is this a test? :scared:
 
Wouldn't Malaysia offer flights to all those locations with the exception of Diego Garcia?

Yes, no kidding. Why would one practice landing on a secret island?

Well, we can say it's fun to fly etc if you're a pilot..., but seriously, practicing to land on a US base does raise some red flags for me. JMO. And, not necessarily the pilot or co-pilot involvement.
 
Malaysia says they received some new radar data, but have not been given permission to say from where.

Search continues.

Who does Malaysia need permission from? Isn't it their plane?
 
Who does Malaysia need permission from? Isn't it their plane?

I think it means that Malaysia has received radar data from another country and they are not at liberty to disclose which country nor the radar info provided to them from that other country
 
If they believe it is up in the mountains there is no place to land up there. It's just mountains, on top of mountains. It seems very remote but I guess it is possible if there were some flat area the plane could land. jmo


There would be fuel, food and whatever else needed. No need to go out until ready. I wonder if the black boxes could be taken off the plane?

Albania, China, India, Pakistan, Italy, North Korea, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Vietnam and Yugoslavia have hidden hangers according to Wikipedia.

The Russians have help the Iranians build several "hidden" facilities.
 
The BF came in earlier and said , hey did you hear they think they know where the plane is. I said oh boy is this a joke? No they think it's in Pakistan. He said I heard on radio listening to Sean Hannity. I said yea that's been out there today also! No new news!
 
The Bangkok Post, the Thai newspaper printed in English.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/investigation/400065/the-passport-checks-that-were-missed

Has this been posted? The article is rather long but thorough.

Note the difference of opinion over the issue of whether fake passports are being produced in Thailand or not.

Ms. Lita explains a three-pronged strategy advised to be used in airports to detect travellers suspected of using a fake passport.

"Ms. Lita said the fake and stolen passports are originally procured in Thailand and then taken back to Pakistan and sold to Afghan nationals who want to enter either the US or Europe."

"In the instance of flight MH370, Italy and Austria had informed Interpol that the two passports had been stolen in Thailand. However, Malaysian immigration officials did not check the database."

"The two Iranians, Pouria Nour Mohammadi, 19, and Reze Devalar, 29, reportedly paid US$10,000 (323,000 baht) each for the stolen passports and flew from Tehran to Kuala Lumpur on Iranian passports."

A young Malaysian man, who had attended high school with one of the men, said the two stayed at his home before the flight and they talked on the phone with a Mr. Ali, believed to be the ticket buyer in Thailand.

:cheers: Great update!

BBM ~ Mr. Ali? That really narrows it down. Ali has to be the most common name in the Middle East.

I still believe they were mules of some sort. If they paid $10,000 for the fake passports, maybe they were offered a return on their investment? Just thinking out loud.
 
Who does Malaysia need permission from? Isn't it their plane?

It's just a guess but I would assume the Country's willing to share don't want it public. It's good most are cooperating.
 
Yes, no kidding. Why would one practice landing on a secret island?

Well, we can say it's fun to fly etc if you're a pilot..., but seriously, practicing to land on a US base does raise some red flags for me. JMO. And, not necessarily the pilot or co-pilot involvement.

These are the 5 closest runways from my understanding.
So if there was an emergency and he had to land somewhere else, those would be the options.
He certainly wasn't planning to hijack a plan and land it on a military base.
The only reason to practice landing there is in case of an emergency, when you have permission to land. :twocents:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
2,632
Total visitors
2,772

Forum statistics

Threads
601,903
Messages
18,131,616
Members
231,183
Latest member
Webster23
Back
Top