AuburnSchnauzer
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2011
- Messages
- 8,782
- Reaction score
- 0
Or do you mean just discuss pilots in general?
I have nothing against pilots - I took flying lessons...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or do you mean just discuss pilots in general?
Who is still considered as victims and by whom? I know all the passengers were...Hey Linda7NJ
That's a good article SilkySfaka. What I'm about to say isn't directed at you. It's directed to the guy in the article who said this;
I cant remember another time when cost trumped a policy decision, said Goelz, a former managing director of the National Transportation Safety Board....
I'm going to give him credit for possibly talking about a government policy based on cost. However, if he's including the private sector he's not all that bright. The private sector makes life and death decisions based on cost all the time.
Thanks Carmelita - I'm curious who has the capability of detecting things up to 3 miles under the ocean's surface in order to retrieve it.
Daily Media Briefing
SEPANG: Acting Transport Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein today said there was no giving up on the search.
"I will not give up hope and I will continue as from day one and I am giving more hope to get the closure to this by the support that we are receiving," he told reporters at the daily media briefing on the updates of missing MH370 here, today. Hishammuddin, who is also Defence Minister, said as more assets had been deployed and more countries came on board, it would give more hope to continue. "But personally, I am not looking back," he stressed.
He also described the search and rescue (SAR) operation as the biggest in history as 26 countries were giving their support and assistance without even mentioning the costs involved. "This is the best part. Nobody, not even Malaysia, not even our partners have talked about dollar and cents. It never cross our minds. The priority is to find the aircraft," he said.
Describing the challenges during the SAR in the southern Indian Ocean, he said the vessels that were deployed to the area would face possible strong current and rough seas. He also said that the vessels had been warned of possible cyclone category one, which currently at Christmas Island area, heading towards the search area.
Read more: UPDATE 27 (Day 15) MISSING MH370: 'I will not give up hope', says Hisham - Latest - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/latest/font-c...ve-up-hope-says-hisham-1.526903#ixzz2wkCxvg9J
Well, for starters we don't know where the aircraft is. There is no hard facts that the pilots are involved. Suspicious activity, perhaps. But, that's all we got thus far.
Innocent until proven guilty. JMO.
That's a good article SilkySfaka. What I'm about to say isn't directed at you. It's directed to the guy in the article who said this;
I cant remember another time when cost trumped a policy decision, said Goelz, a former managing director of the National Transportation Safety Board....
I'm going to give him credit for possibly talking about a government policy based on cost. However, if he's including the private sector he's not all that bright. The private sector makes life and death decisions based on cost all the time.
Ford knew that the Pinto had a problem with exploding gas tanks http://users.wfu.edu/palmitar/Law&Valuation/Papers/1999/Leggett-pinto.html They had an accountant sit down and calculate how much it would cost to fix it, then calculate the cost of lawsuits. Turned out that it would be cheaper to let people die and just pay off the families than it would be to fix the problem. Fortunately, this was discovered during one of the cases brought against Ford, and the judge was so pizzed off that he trebled the damages. Thus making it a loss for Ford in the long run.
Some people get pizzed off at liability lawyers for bringing outrageous suits and I am one of them too, but they've done a lot of good too on valid lawsuits. I believe the Pinto case finally outed a basic corporate tactic that had been (and still is) going on since the first business was formed. The judges precedent of trebling the damages helped make it unprofitable. Other business' took notice and raised the price of people's lives, but we all have a price on our heads.
Is it cheaper at work to remodel an area to make it safer or if they put up a sign saying "CAREFUL" are they then absolved any liability? Most of the time the sign is good enough and if you hurt yourself you weren't being "CAREFUL".
So people need to think about what price they have on their heads? GM seems to have known about the airbag problem for years and did nothing about it. It appears they thought they could cover it up. Well they couldn't and now they're gonna be in deep doo doo if they knew back in 2004. I'm pretty sure that no matter how much they are fined or hand out in lawsuits, family members would rather have the loved one back.
Most companies treat their employees with the least they can get away with. That's why unions formed. If you think your company is being gracious because they give you an extra week of vacation, they're not. They must feel that giving out another week of vacation keeps them competitive in the market. The government has to force business' to increase their minimum pay to someone and there is a lot of political wrangling over a dime increase.
Companies want you to buy something so they can make the most profit and if it kills you, but is cheaper to ignore, then bye bye. :seeya: If there are a hundred guys looking for one job, a business can pay as little as they are legally allowed and the guy who gets the job will thank God. If he doesn't like the job he's told he can find another one that another 100 people have applied for.
Airlines are no different. If the plane crashes the insurance company will pay for it. Their insurance rates will increase, but it won't bankrupt the airline.
Sorry for the :rant: but it really struck me as a dumb thing for that guy to say. JMO
A pilot on CNN said pretty much the same thing. He said the Hudson river is smooth not choppy like ocean water. He also said that there's a reason it's referred to as the "Miracle" on the Hudson.
Nope. But maybe you could make us more drawings to keep us entertained!
Were we not allowed to discuss pilots of 9/11 ?
That's what we do here. Express our opinions. Great to see you again ElleElle!
Let's assume the Black Box is located at the sea bottom where debris has been spotted - Does anyone know how deep the water is and if a black box has ever been recovered at that depth?
It must be 930AM on Sunday in Perth, Australia now.
Is there SAR today? TIA.
The area is marked by strong currents and rough seas, and the ocean depth varies between 3,770 feet and 23,000 feet.
http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3371878.shtml?cat=565
The recorders are supposed to function at depths of 20,000 feet.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...1cb3d8-a8a2-11e3-b61e-8051b8b52d06_story.html
I don't know specifically what it is called but it is a small submersible and it maps the ocean's floor and sends images (can't remember what kind of images as I was getting ready to run out the door) I'll try to do some Googling and see what I can find out about it.
It is a robotic submersable created by the folks at Woods Hole Institute.
It is the vehicle used to find the Air France plane in the Atlantic in 2011 (and many other things, I am sure).
Nereus (underwater vehicle) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I do hope that they are searching away from the actual location where debris are seen on satellite.
Clearly they won't still be there... they need to be looking kilometers away from that area. lease:
In my researching plane crashes I am finding some AMAZING stories.
This was one of the most amazing emergency landings ever...
It was brought up again after the Miracle on the Hudson.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/TACA_Flight_110
TACA Airline flight 110 - Nowhere To Land - YouTube