Very curious to know what kind of bag the "blue bag" that was spotted is.
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott told reporters on Saturday morning black box recovery equipment was about to be put on a navy ship in Perth.
"It will be taken to the most prospective search area and if there is good reason to deploy it, it will be deployed," he said in Sydney.
Me too. But then my first thought was only one bag? Where's the other 238 bags?
What kind of bag would be on the aircraft that would float and there was only one?
Sadly first thought... a diaper bag?
Backpack?
:dunno:
They didn't call it a suitcase...or luggage.
moo
Sent from my LG-D801 using Tapatalk
Oh wow, great thought gngr snap. Or would diapers get soggy and weigh it down? I wonder how long other suitcases would float?
It cost 38 million dollars - here is the fleet they usedI'm a bit confused but I think it's outside of Australia's territory. It's international waters and not in Australia's jurisdiction. But it is in our search and rescue zone. Don't get me wrong though, I think it's right what Australia is doing.
http://www.ga.gov.au/marine/jurisdiction/maritime-boundary-definitions.html
CARIIS, thank you so much for all the research you've been doing! The Malaysia Airlines accidents post from earlier today was very interesting too!
I was just rewatching a show on that plane in Brazil that crashed after colliding with a smaller jet due to ATC errors. The smaller jet was state of the art, but its transponder failed. It had originally been on another plane, and was malfunctioning. They repaired it and put it on the new plane after extensively testing it. When the transponder failed, ground radar took over, and it was described as "wildly inaccurate" in certain situations and that the pilots may not notice that the transponder has failed. They thought the plane was going way up and down and that the pilots were showing off on their new jet, but that was just the radar giving weird readings. They couldn't find an issue with the transponder and now think that a pilot accidentally turned it off while familiarizing himself with the new jet's features (this was the first flight and was kind of a test). He knew how to fly the plane, but some of the monitoring/nonessential aspects of it (estimated arrival time) were not where he was used to and he had to figure them out. Seems very relevant to this case. Not saying that's what happened, but it indicates that some of the erratic flying people have been building theories on could mean nothing.
ETA: Apparently you could accidentally turn off the transponder using the feetrest in this case - the U.S. issued recommendations saying that should no longer be possible, and that an alarm should go off. So I assume things have changed.
What kind of bag would be on the aircraft that would float and there was only one?
Sadly first thought... a diaper bag?
Backpack?
:dunno:
They didn't call it a suitcase...or luggage.
moo
Sent from my LG-D801 using Tapatalk
I see you enjoy the "Air Crash Investigation" series as much as I do. Good point about how reported data isn't always correct and isn't found out until much later.
Push to take control: Australia to lead the probe into MH370
International conventions covering aviation accidents require the country of origin of the aircraft to launch an investigation and secure the wreckage - in this case Malaysia.
But Australia has the facilities in Canberra to download the data from the black box flight recorder. In the region, Singapore, Indonesia and Japan have this capability, but it is understood that Malaysia does not.
Indeed, Australian Transport Safety Bureau Chief Commissioner Martin Dolan stressed on Friday that any wreckage recovered needed initially to be brought to Australia.
Under the arrangement, Malaysian investigators would travel to Australia to carry out any work on the wreckage. Malaysia would still lead the investigation but would be assisted by counterparts from Australia, Britain and the US.