cujenn81
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2013
- Messages
- 4,243
- Reaction score
- 22,488
Isn't Kazakhstan the place the Boston Bombers were from?
Or BORAT?
My geography sucks. I'll admit it. Typical American.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Isn't Kazakhstan the place the Boston Bombers were from?
the plane. You said it could be they could be sending a message to the hijacker to throw them off and not put passengers at risk but I don't understand how that could be or how the plane could be going.
(I'm so lost on this crap I can't even tell you so I'm sorry I'm coming off as an idiot.)
just hours after the 12.40am flight disappeared, the Malaysia Airlines chief executive, Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, said the plane was still in contact with air traffic controllers about two hours into the flight, pinning the last contact at about 2.40am at a point 120 nautical miles off the east coast http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/14/flight-mh370-false-leads-confusion-hunt-missing-plane
I have to roll and scroll. I can't give out any more information. Sorry.
Take off time.
8:11 last contact.
8 hours and 10 minutes.
good night, again,
Take off time.
8:11 last contact.
8 hours and 10 minutes.
Yes and what about the chinese guy who's passport wasn't stolen, but his number was used and he wasn't on the flight.
Has that ever been addressed???
Will the satellites give them information if the plane is on the ground?
I thought that's the whole reason the satellites helped... because it was in the air.
(There isn't a whole lot to track in the air that is unidentified, compared to the ground.)
Would they be able to see it land, drop out of the sky, or whatever on satellites?
Then would they be able to track where it ended up on land or in the water with satellites?
We need someone to confirm whether the satellites would help on the ground or not.... :dunno:
And we were told they had 7.5 - 8 hours of fuel.
I don't like that timeline at all... lease:
But wait... 12:40am to 8:11am would be 7 hours and 31 minutes, wouldn't it?
I've put on my thinking cap since making that post. I now believe everything the PM said was very deliberate and meant to lull the hijackers into a false sense of security. Or I'm just really tired and full of it
The way I understand it, the engines were pinging the satellites as the plane was flying, why wouldn't they ping on the ground if the engines were still running? or maybe even if they weren't....everyone keeps asking why we don't have better technology for tracking aircraft. Maybe we do and we don't want to let the terrorist know so that they can't learn how to disable it..
I do agree. I think that is why there has been so much back tracking. When stuff like this happens there is always some numpty who wants to been seen to be involved, to be important, to impress their friends or the public and leeks information. So someone may be leaking info or a theory that shouldn't be out there, it's either true or proved false, but either way it needs to be retracted and leads to a situation like this where everyone is confused and it seems like no one knows what is happening.
You know how there is always someone who comes along and says about how their husband/ sister/ friend gave them some "info" but they can't say any more because of "....stuff???".
Lets hope.
The only problem is I believe the Hi-jackers only wanted to steal the plane. I dont think they have demands.
Could they have refueled on land... or in air?
Just a thought we kicked around a few million pages ago...
JMO
I'm wondering if they flew until they were over land and reasonably near to wherever they wanted to land, then went lower in altitude so that they couldn't be detected by radar.
At first we thought they only had 4 hours of fuel in board, now we know it was 7. Perhaps there was even more? Somehow?
Can't find the napkin I wrote stuff on but think I had Kosrae island, Kosrae Shangqiu, Kashmir and Jammu, and Maharashtra. What a mess.