kimi_SFC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Messages
- 10,253
- Reaction score
- 147
What do you think the bodies would have shown, had them been collected and returned earlier?
I don't understand what people think the bodies would tell us about the circumstances of the crash. The consensus is that a BUK missile hit the plane, this can be verified by the wreckage itself, not the bodies. The bodies won't tell us anything about who hit the plane and whether it was on purpose or a mistake. So I'm wondering what evidence they would give us.
With all due respect, I've seen it posted that aviation and weapons experts might be able to deduce the location of the missile strike based on the injuries of the passengers (relative to their seating location). I posted a tweet and twitpic about this subject upthread.
IMO, the longer the victims are not in the custody of authorities who have the ability to perform the proper forensic analysis, all evidence is subject to deterioration, contamination, tampering, etc.
As long as there is any dispute as to who fired what (and although we may have a clear idea here at WS, the world as a whole is not in agreement), the evidence is the only thing that is irrefutable.
Sadly, I worry these delays may be happening for a reason. If that's the case, it bears the questions: Why? What is there to hide? And who has the motive to do so?
:moo:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk