SilkySifaka
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,933
- Reaction score
- 30
even CNN is hardly covering it today, a couple of short sections, 2 mins each and off to other stuff.
IMO there is something fishy here
...........but switched to another flight to avoid having a stopover.
MAL 370 was direct right?
Thanks.
I thought I heard 2. Yet, I just read the passenger list that someone posted earlier, and I don't see any US names?
Weren't they saying initially there were 20+ Americans on the manifest
My dear lord, reading that and seeing name after name stating the Netherlands is shocking!
'Ukrainian security forces have released an audio of what is alleged to be a series of intercepted phone call between the Oleksandr Serhiyovych, the leader of rebel fighter unit Vostok Battalion, and another rebel, identified only as Andriy. The conversations suggest that the rebels may already be in possession of up to three of the boxes '
“The boxes must be under our control,” says the voice purported to be Serhiyobych. “Our friends from high above are very interested in the fate of the ‘black boxes’. I mean people from Moscow”.
The newly released video is also at the link. I'm not sure how to post it here.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...a-live-updates#block-53cbd71fe4b0f8fc11b98138
here is what the rebels said on the black box and a pic of them holding it
IMO there is something fishy here
...........but switched to another flight to avoid having a stopover.
MAL 370 was direct right?
He was scheduled to take missing flight MH370 from Kuala Lumpur in March to compete in Taiwan for a race, but switched to another flight to avoid having a stopover. http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/mh17-and-mh370-dutch-cyclist-booked-to-fly-on-both-doomed-malaysia-airlines-planes/story-fnizu68q-1226995067518
@CNNVideo - 2h
A Ukrainian family says the body of a #MH17 passenger fell through their roof:
http://t.co/e54atDHMon
http://t.co/qiYRiHMuMb
http://twitter.com/CNNVideo/status/490929573861683201l
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
PM David Cameron's (@David_Cameron) Facebook post - 11h
David Cameron
11 hrs ·
Like the horror of Lockerbie in 1988 when I was a young man, the images of the burnt-out Malaysian plane, 298 victims and their personal effects strewn across the wheatfields and villages around Grabovo in eastern Ukraine will never leave me.
Ten of our own citizens died; we grieve for them this weekend. So too did 27 Australians, including members of a family who had previously lost relatives on flight MH370; 43 Malaysians and 192 Dutch citizens also died a huge blow to our friends and allies. We stand shoulder to shoulder with those countries and with all those affected by this outrage.
But alongside our sympathy there is also anger. Anger that this could happen; anger that a conflict that could have been stopped by Moscow has been fomented by Moscow; anger that some in the West, instead of finding the resolve to deal with this issue, have simply hoped it would go away.
We must establish the full facts of what happened. But the growing weight of evidence points to a clear conclusion: that flight MH17 was blown out of the sky by a surface-to-air missile fired from a rebel-held area.
If this is the case then we must be clear what it means: this is a direct result of Russia destabilising a sovereign state, violating its territorial integrity, backing thuggish militias and training and arming them.
We must turn this moment of outrage into a moment of action. Action to find those who committed this crime and bring them to justice. But this goes much wider than justice.
In Europe we should not need to be reminded of the consequences of turning a blind eye when big countries bully smaller countries. We should not need reminding of the consequences of letting the doctrine of might is right prevail. We should not need to be reminded of the lessons of European history.
But we do. For too long there has been a reluctance on the part of too many European countries to face up to the implications of what is happening in eastern Ukraine.
Sitting around the European Council table on Wednesday evening I saw that reluctance at work again.
Some countries, with Britain at the forefront, have consistently pushed for action that reflects the magnitude of the long-term threat. They tend to be the countries with the closest physical proximity to Russia and the most direct experience of what is at stake. Their own independence and nationhood have come at a high price. They never forget it. But others seem more anxious to make this a problem to be managed and contained, not a challenge to be met and mastered.
Elegant forms of words and fine communiqués are no substitute for real action. The weapons and fighters being funnelled across the border between Russia and eastern Ukraine; the support to the militias; the half-truths, the bluster, the delays. They have to stop.
Some international crises are insoluble. Not this one. If President Vladimir Putin stops the support to the fighters in eastern Ukraine and allows the Ukrainian authorities to restore order, this crisis can be brought to an end. Of course there must be proper protections for Russian-speaking minorities. These issues can be addressed. But the overriding need is for Russia to cease its support for violent separatists.
If President Putin does not change his approach to Ukraine, then Europe and the West must fundamentally change our approach to Russia.
This is not about military action, plainly. But it is time to make our power, influence and resources count.
Our economies are strong and growing in strength. And yet we sometimes behave as if we need Russia more than Russia needs us and the access we provide to European markets, European capital, our knowledge and technological expertise.
We dont seek a relationship of confrontation with Russia. But we must not shrink from standing up for the principles that govern conduct between independent nations in Europe and which ultimately keep the peace on our continent.
So let us be clear about what needs to happen.
First, there must be immediate access to the crash site and the crime scene must be preserved. The remains of the victims must be identified, treated with proper respect and dignity and returned to their families. There must be a ceasefire. And there must be a full investigation into what happened. Russia will have plenty of information about these events which it must make fully available and straight away.
Second, Russia must immediately halt supplies and training for the rebels. They do not represent the people of Ukraine. Without Russian support they will wither.
Finally, we must establish proper long-term relationships between Ukraine and the European Union; between Ukraine and Russia; and, above all, between Russia and the European Union, Nato and the wider West.
What form that relationship takes rests on how Russia responds to this appalling tragedy. Russia can use this moment to find a path out of this festering, dangerous crisis. I hope it will do so. But if that does not happen then we must respond robustly.
Nearly 25 years ago Britain hosted the Nato summit that ended the Cold War and began the process of ushering Russia back into the councils of the world.
In six weeks time Britain will host a Nato summit in Wales at which the relationship with Russia will again take centre stage. It is up to Russia which path that relationship now takes.
via https://m.facebook.com/DavidCameronOfficial/posts/813717755319211
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ABC News Moscow Correspondent - verified twitter feed:
@KiritRadia - 5h
Rebel leader Borodai says he guarantees safety of intl investigators to inspect #MH17 wreckage. Insists doesn't know why they haven't come
http://twitter.com/KiritRadia/status/490915393524211712
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In an exclusive interview with ABC News today, the leader of the self-declared Donetsk People's Republic said they would not be turned over until international inspectors come here to inspect them.
"We can and we want to give bodies to the relatives but experts have to examine the bodies here. That is international practice," Alexander Borodai said.
He feared that if the remains are turned over to the Ukrainian government they will be used as evidence to blame his fighters for shooting down the plane, something he again denied.
The problem is that the team of international investigators remains in Kiev. Despite what has been described as a "preliminary" agreement on their travel to the crash site, there has been no announcement about when they might finally arrive.
"We guarantee their safety and their ability to work. After that the bodies can be transported wherever," Borodai said. He insisted that he placed no conditions on their travel to the crash site and wants an "open and independent" investigation.
Borodai said he was willing to provide the remains unconditionally to the Russian government because he trusted them. Given Western accusations about Russia's backing for the rebels, however, it remains to be seen if that will be an acceptable offer.
Been following but not posting... Are people seriously in favor of going to war with Russia over this?
If European nations want to act then let them do it (and I don't know enough about the Netherlands' media to say whether the aggressive article translated earlier is indeed representative of that country's collective attitude, or whether it is just a hawkish publication in general), and I doubt a majority of European citizens would be in favor since the repercussions would be quite dire (unlike Americans, who are over here, across the big water, where we can "safely" cheerlead the west into yet another war we do not need).
Might I also note how short a memory the US public has, and how glad I am that no one started military action when we shot the Iranian civilian airliner out of the sky, killing all on board, back in the late 80s?? :facepalm:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know it's crazy... but the fact that both these flights originally shared a co-pilot?
That's kind of creepy.
http://english.astroawani.com/news/...h370-co-pilot-fated-to-perish-with-mh17-40316
My first thought was "was this co-pilot the target on MH370 but then the last minute change meant he wasn't a victim?"
Makes me think of the possibility of this being a second attempt to kill the co-pilot.
I know that isn't what it is... but it's a bit crazy to think about the odds he'd be assigned to both planes. :twocents:
Bravo. I hope we hear similar sentiments from the rest of the west.
Been following but not posting... Are people seriously in favor of going to war with Russia over this?
If European nations want to act then let them do it (and I don't know enough about the Netherlands' media to say whether the aggressive article translated earlier is indeed representative of that country's collective attitude, or whether it is just a hawkish publication in general), and I doubt a majority of European citizens would be in favor since the repercussions would be quite dire (unlike Americans, who are over here, across the big water, where we can "safely" cheerlead the west into yet another war we do not need).
Might I also note how short a memory the US public has, and how glad I am that no one started military action when we shot the Iranian civilian airliner out of the sky, killing all on board, back in the late 80s?? :facepalm:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk