Well since you are pushing for the theory that the family has something to do with it for a while now.
And you are entitle to your opinion. What is your theory of what happened?
Questioning how someone snuck in and took Nóra doesn’t mean the family had something to do with it. I just think it’s hard to believe none of them heard anything. But the idea that someone climbed in the window, went up stairs, took a teenager from a room with others in it, and then snuck her back downstairs and out the window... and nobody heard anything? I have to do serious mental gymnastics and let go of all common sense to make that work. IMO the simplest idea is typically what happened.
I’m currently no longer sure on my theory. Nobody jump on me for family blaming, because I’m not saying this definitely happened or even that it’s plausible now that we know the space was recently searched. I’m not victim blaming but I am being honest about what my first instinct is on what occurred. Right now from what I read tonight it doesn’t seem as likely, but I’ll share my thoughts anyway.
Initially my theory was that Nora was accidentally harmed by a family member, and the parents staged it for fear of losing their remaining kids (same theory I have on JonBenet Ramsey, for the most part) and having the kids be separated from them in a foreign country... I can easily understand the fear of losing my child to social services in a foreign country if they didn’t believe me that something accidental occurred.
In my theory it was a parent who just lost it, perhaps due to a long day of exhausting travel and maybe Nora had a meltdown due to being out of her usual place and routine, and something terrible happened, *completely unintentionally*. To me this doesn’t seem as out there as the intruder theory or the sibling theory or her leaving on her own.
I 100% do not believe anyone in her family intended to harm her. While we all can agree that normally someone would report an accidental death vs cover it up, but what if the risk was the remaining kids’ stability? I can see someone going to this extreme if they feared they would be prosecuted and lose the other kids. And I can appreciate that. Nothing will bring a deceased child back, but they can still protect the others. In this theory, the family is desperate to make everyone think someone else did it, directing people away from the jungle, not out of self preservation but out of love and fear for their remaining kids.
BUT, that said... if this specific area was 100% guaranteed searched the day or two before (someone here said that tonight, but I can’t recall if an article was attached) and she wasn’t there, then my theory doesn’t work so it can’t be the case.
So I don’t know where I currently stand on a theory. This case is puzzling and I doubt the statement about her autopsy will tell us anything except that they are pending a final report in a few weeks once toxicology tests come back.