frankie069
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Messages
- 869
- Reaction score
- 0
BBM I added an R for you. :floorlaugh:
OH NO.. Really.. I have to stop typing so fast and proof read.. My apologies to the WS staff... Ugh... That is too funny..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BBM I added an R for you. :floorlaugh:
You would have approached a man who was walking alone in the wee hours of the night with a baby, who actually avoided you by walking away from the road toward a house as you slowed your car and approached? I don't see how you could say something "casual" to someone in that case. It's not like he's standing behind you in the grocery store line. He's walking down the street, and then as you approach, avoiding contact.
Right, but my point is, why did you state you believe LE's version of the events over Deborah's? They haven't given their version of the events. Only Deborah has.
I have no idea. I tend to think LE checked out the first sighting, and getting a perfectly innocent explanation, they discounted it as having anything to do with Lisa.It should be simple enough to find out if there is a family in the neighborhood that has a black man and a white baby living there. Has this been mentioned or checked out? tia
How many sightings were there of Caylee?? Unfortunately, she was lying in the woods, rotting. But, LE had to check out every one of those sightings. When they said the sightings were discounted....they were correct.
Bumping this from page 1 because now I'm not seeing mention in the working link of an African American man...but I remember seeing it mentioned early on in this case. Could this have been reporter error?
Right, but my point is, why did you state you believe LE's version of the events over Deborah's? They haven't given their version of the events. Only Deborah has.
Oh I certainly would have without a doubt. In the middle of the night with an unclothed baby in the cold.. Yes I would have approached that person and called the police just in case, even not knowing about the Lisa case. I have had instances where there have been groups of kids outside in the wee hours of the night and my butt was outside my door watching them to make sure there wasnt going to be a fight or something, I have no problem getting involved at all. I would rather be safe than sorry.
Lacy Peterson too. There even was a cashier who claimed she saw "Laci" in a supermarket.
In this case there already have been a number of "Lisa" sightings, even in CA.
OH NO.. Really.. I have to stop typing so fast and proof read.. My apologies to the WS staff... Ugh... That is too funny..
Right, but my point is, why did you state you believe LE's version of the events over Deborah's? They haven't given their version of the events. Only Deborah has.
But those WERE all real people. I don't think either witness is claiming here that it was Baby Lisa, rather, a man carrying a baby similar to Baby Lisa.
Like the cashier saw a woman who looked similar to Laci.
This is completely MOO so take it or leave it. I really think that one needs to be careful when making a definitive decision in their mind whether someone is guilty or innocent based on media interviews. DB and JI are NOT media savvy individuals. The media can and will spin a person's own statements in whatever way will be the most sensational for them. I can guarantee that if you were bestfriends with DB and wanted to tell the media some information about DB's character, they would slice and dice that interview until you made her out to be the devil. MOO :twocents: That's why I'm sitting on this fence until I hear some actual facts. All we know definitevely is that a baby is missing. :fence:
LE cannot give any information. Do you think when someone is shot, they give the make of the gun, no, only the killer would know that, so they keep that to themselves so when they find the killer or the shooter they have that information that wasnt made public. They CANNOT make things public. Its frustrating to us but prosecution wise, they cant. I dont need LE's version when I have DB's. LE is keeping quiet as they should, DB should have taken lessons from them. I have faith in the police in this case and until they give me reason not to have faith in them I will continue to.. They know their job and what they can release.
LE cannot give any information. Do you think when someone is shot, they give the make of the gun, no, only the killer would know that, so they keep that to themselves so when they find the killer or the shooter they have that information that wasnt made public. They CANNOT make things public. Its frustrating to us but prosecution wise, they cant. I dont need LE's version when I have DB's. LE is keeping quiet as they should, DB should have taken lessons from them. I have faith in the police in this case and until they give me reason not to have faith in them I will continue to.. They know their job and what they can release.
This is true, but I've heard and seen enough of DB to know the media isn't having to spin much. DB is constantly shoving her foot into her mouth knee deep. Not that it makes her guilty, just saying she's making herself look bad - the media has an easy job of it, just put a microphone under her nose.This is completely MOO so take it or leave it. I really think that one needs to be careful when making a definitive decision in their mind whether someone is guilty or innocent based on media interviews. DB and JI are NOT media savvy individuals. The media can and will spin a person's own statements in whatever way will be the most sensational for them. I can guarantee that if you were bestfriends with DB and wanted to tell the media some information about DB's character, they would slice and dice that interview until you made her out to be the devil. MOO :twocents: That's why I'm sitting on this fence until I hear some actual facts. All we know definitevely is that a baby is missing. :fence:
no prob, I'm always going back to edit for spelling.