Peter Brendt
New Member
It doesn't sound like you even know the definition of physics.
Its less than 30 miles, and drifting that far without a storm is an everyday occurance, let alone historical flooding for the barrier island. You do not even want to get me started on what i know about the bay and currents. They drifted to blue point beach from somewhere ss, sure maybe he threw the legs in the bay in sayville or anywhere else along the bay, but seeing as he was putting the other identifyiable parts on jones island and the timing of the find, id have to say they came from the shorline of jones island down to bp beach. But i guess we could debate the sk dropping them from a hot air balloon or building a massive hydrolic slingshot if u want....
Well, you got me there. I'm a diver for now over twenty-five years, I've been under water in more currents than you have ever read about. And as part of my university times, because in IT was back then considered an engineering major in Germany, I had also basic physics. And so on and so on. So what do I know about water? Truth, come down to the carpet again, get a good formula book and do some math. Whatever transported those legs was current, not wind! Because they would have projected far enough above the surface to have an pressure area big enough to "sail". Which, by the way, is the only little thing, that would support your theory unless you make us believe, things go, driven by the wind, against the wind. Now that would be really a new kind of physics.
And the reason why I don't by your theory is, the signature of AC, Manorville and LISK are too different and in wrong chronological order. Which has nothing to do with physics in the first place. So please, <modsnip> return to reality.