Just Catching up but two things come to mind:
1. With the GB4 we, IIRC, were told that there was some difference in the decomposition rates, in at least some of the victims, yet we are told that COD was Strangulation.
How do they know that? Was there was some tissue left on the bones or were the remains intact and wrapped well enough so that the hyoid bones were visible and showed evidence of strangulation fracture?
We know that GB4 went missing over a three year span (2007-2010)
We assume that they were each kept for at least some time before being discarded.
We suspect this b/c of the phone calls to MB's little sister.
2. With this latest MV skeleton, it seems odd that the guy who found it would note that it was wrapped in bedsheets and then black trash bags yet make note that he didn't notice any shoes.
Why did that stand out to him? Was the plastic with duct tape & the sheet so thread bare that he could see that the skeleton was clothed but lacking shoes? If he couldn't see through the wrapping then that is akin to saying it didn't have a hat or gloves. IMO he could tell that the skeleton was clothed.
If that is the case, it is a big difference between GB4, the other two Manorville females and possibly the fire island, Peaches and Cherries cases where, IIRC, they were not clothed. In the AC case, all four victims were clothed minus any shoes and socks.
But as far as remains turning up along OP, there is that one video clip with an officer carrying out a brown tennis shoe which looks like it had tan stripes on it. If that is related to any of the GB4, or Manorville remains that were found off of OP, why don't they put a picture of that shoe out for the public to see? Someone might recognize it as what someone was wearing when they were last seen.
We have been told that the GB4 were naked, right?
1. With the GB4 we, IIRC, were told that there was some difference in the decomposition rates, in at least some of the victims, yet we are told that COD was Strangulation.
How do they know that? Was there was some tissue left on the bones or were the remains intact and wrapped well enough so that the hyoid bones were visible and showed evidence of strangulation fracture?
We know that GB4 went missing over a three year span (2007-2010)
We assume that they were each kept for at least some time before being discarded.
We suspect this b/c of the phone calls to MB's little sister.
2. With this latest MV skeleton, it seems odd that the guy who found it would note that it was wrapped in bedsheets and then black trash bags yet make note that he didn't notice any shoes.
Why did that stand out to him? Was the plastic with duct tape & the sheet so thread bare that he could see that the skeleton was clothed but lacking shoes? If he couldn't see through the wrapping then that is akin to saying it didn't have a hat or gloves. IMO he could tell that the skeleton was clothed.
If that is the case, it is a big difference between GB4, the other two Manorville females and possibly the fire island, Peaches and Cherries cases where, IIRC, they were not clothed. In the AC case, all four victims were clothed minus any shoes and socks.
But as far as remains turning up along OP, there is that one video clip with an officer carrying out a brown tennis shoe which looks like it had tan stripes on it. If that is related to any of the GB4, or Manorville remains that were found off of OP, why don't they put a picture of that shoe out for the public to see? Someone might recognize it as what someone was wearing when they were last seen.
We have been told that the GB4 were naked, right?