Diddian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2020
- Messages
- 2,984
- Reaction score
- 49,614
Yes, at 0:04 - 0:05 in the video.I have no SM so can’t view, is the arm visible?
Yes, at 0:04 - 0:05 in the video.I have no SM so can’t view, is the arm visible?
But too many people saw it. Comments made over the weekend and replied to, on a major network story with the video, commenting on the person escorting him out the door and almost familiarly “bidding him adieu” before shutting the door for him, have been deleted.Not sure but I just went to watch the vid if suspect and the three I looked at no longer show the arm closing the door. Appears to have been edited.
Jmo
Yes, at 0:04 - 0:05 in the video.
What was this perp's intent in the California incident? A robbery? Did he expect an empthy home? Why didn't he disguise himself? He knew a witness could recognize him. Did he leave his shirt behind? If the intent was an attack, it seems that the victim was compliant, which might have saved their life. Did the victim persuade him to leave, perhaps by telling him that the family would be home any minute?
Was there a different motive in the Maryland case? Did he plan to rob RM? Did he plan to kill? Why would he worry about being recognized in one but not the other case?
Maybe because everyone is focused on the child slamming the door behind him but instead of recognizing it as what was reported there is so much speculation that the VICTIM was somehow friendly or involved with the suspect despite there being zero evidence of this. Perhaps the comments were deleted to avoid further trashing of the victim.But too many people saw it. Comments made over the weekend and replied to, on a major network story with the video, commenting on the person escorting him out the door and almost familiarly “bidding him adieu” before shutting the door for him, have been deleted.
Possibly. For argument's sake though...Maybe because everyone is focused on the child slamming the door behind him but instead of recognizing it as what was reported there is so much speculation that the VICTIM was somehow friendly or involved with the suspect despite there being zero evidence of this. Perhaps the comments were deleted to avoid further trashing of the victim.
Possibly. For argument's sake though...
First, I thought LE said the victim was a, "young woman"...that's not necessarily a child...could be...but might not be.
Second, I don't recall there being any statements made that connect the individual closing the door as being the victim. Again, might be...but it's possible it could be someone else that lives there...or an accomplice to the crime? I'm not sure it's been said whether or not the individual is alleged to have committed that crime alone.
Third, I think the behavior of the suspect is the "evidence" that doesn't compute for people. This guy doesn't behave in a manner that one would expect from someone who just burgled a home in one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in the US.
JMO
We don’t know if that’s the victim or an accomplice.Maybe because everyone is focused on the child slamming the door behind him but instead of recognizing it as what was reported there is so much speculation that the VICTIM was somehow friendly or involved with the suspect despite there being zero evidence of this. Perhaps the comments were deleted to avoid further trashing of the victim.
So the accomplice lives at the house, the suspect burgled the home of his accomplice, the accomplice slams the door as he leaves, and LE can't identify him? Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying?We don’t know if that’s the victim or an accomplice.
It’s possible a young person helped him into the house and the owners or someone returned unexpectedly- maybe a young girl walked in on something and maybe this dude and the person shutting the door threatened the girl. It’s a possibility since the police said the assault was not sexual in nature.So the accomplice lives at the house, the suspect burgled the home of his accomplice, the accomplice slams the door as he leaves, and LE can't identify him? Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
No, the victim was called a young girl.Possibly. For argument's sake though...
First, I thought LE said the victim was a, "young woman"...that's not necessarily a child...could be...but might not be.
Second, I don't recall there being any statements made that connect the individual closing the door as being the victim. Again, might be...but it's possible it could be someone else that lives there...or an accomplice to the crime? I'm not sure it's been said whether or not the individual is alleged to have committed that crime alone.
Third, I think the behavior of the suspect is the "evidence" that doesn't compute for people. This guy doesn't behave in a manner that one would expect from someone who just burgled a home in one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in the US.
JMO
WMAR Baltimore used the term, "young woman"...that's where I saw it. Clear as mud lol.The man suspected of killing a Maryland woman on a popular hiking trail this month is the same person who assaulted a young girl in Southern California in the spring, according to DNA results, investigators announced Thursday.
![]()
Suspect in Rachel Morin's death on Maryland trail linked to LA assault by DNA, police say
DNA from the the person who likely killed Rachel Morin on a Maryland trail matched that of a man who assaulted a girl in LA in March, police say.www.usatoday.com
Edit: hit reply too soon, That ^ should answer your first. Secondly, no there is not confirmation that the small arm slamming the door is the victim, but I'll assume it is until we're told otherwise. Granted that's a risk on my end that i'm willing to take. Third, I don't know why the video doesn't compute as a burglar leaving. If he broke in when no one was home, then was surprised by a young girl who arrived and left with shirt & shoes in hand, to me that makes sense. She was scared, didn't know what he was there for, he just left but not before leaving DNA and in some way assaulting the poor child.
My guess would be, if you killed someone, it's reasonable to assume LE would be looking for you, even if they don't know it's you, that they're looking for.We can only hope that one of the tips that came in since the LA video was released will lead to finding this guy. I don't think knowing anything else about the LA home crime is going to help us on WS. I am wondering if this guy even knows that he's being looked for? He could be on the move from one area to another and not keeping up with news. JMO