Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,824
- Reaction score
- 59,220
Ok, great, you can be uninterested in the details of how, and just be happy the cases are solved - but I happen to be very interested in exactly how cases are solved. So, "Let us be..." just expressing our own thoughts freely on an internet forum.
JMO
You are not interested how cases are solved, you want to know what specifically database they used, that's a difference.
And seriously - do we always know what really helps solve cases? It might be a very specific detergent or a ticket left in someone's pocket, but it can also be a tip. Tips are never disclosed, right? So each time I read unbelievable stories, I am skeptical.
Likewise, it might be something LE got from electronic devices, but they may be uninterested in disclosing the technology.
A recent case of the famed Finnish hacker Aleksanteri Kivimäki was resolved, as the police states, by a stray photo, but I have my doubts. Hacking is a multimillion-dollar business, maybe another hacker was unhappy with him?
But in this case, LE said, it was genetic criminology. How genetic criminology works, we know. Where they got a match, might be a trade secret. I know that it has to stand in the court of law, so it is not 23@me or any commercial DNA database. I don't think anyone owes to reveal specific details.