.
I was interested in hearing the other inconsistencies, but Welcome to the maddeness!
However, if you are interested in what inconsistencies (holes might be a better term) here are few. An even better phrase might be concerns that raise doubt about involvement.
1. The time of dinner-Amanda did try to move it out later than it seems from others statements about the time. I think it could be an honest mistake or an attempt to create stronger alibi. Even if she is lying and not mistaken it could be because she was worried about becoming a suspect. I might do it under similar circumstances. I think Randall Adams did the same thing, because he got dropped off by David Harris immediately before Harris shot the officer. I think Adams fibbed by about 30-60 minutes about what time he got back to his motel room. This was not brought out in the film, but it was my interpretation of when drive-in movies play and when shows were on in the Central Time Zone back in 1980.
2. RS bleeding after dinner according to AK-People cut themselves all the time while preparing a meal. I think it is more likely that he cut himself repairing or trying to fix the leaking pipe, if he really was bleeding. Again it is not that weird but seems suspicious when there is a murder.
3.Transportation of the mop-Again people do this sort of thing all the time, but seems sketchy if a murder has occurred.
4. Demeanor at the time of discovery of Meredith Kercher's body-Difficult to discern how much of it is after the fact interpretation by the witnessess. I know in the Willingham case if you compared the witness transcripts to the officers at the scene to those same witnesses trial testimony it was almost 180 degrees opposite interpretation of Willinghams actions and demeanor. Why? Because the witnesses had altered their recollections of Willingham to fit their new judgement that he was guilty.
I would vote for not guilty for AK and RS at the present time. I have theory they might have looked at MK for a time period before they called police, because of RS is suppposedly into gore. When I was in college, I worked at a hospital and this student around my age came into the E.R. D.O.A. I had seen corpses before, but I had not seen one that was my age and not of natural causes. So, a coworker told me to go check it out (I worked in a different dept.), to see what happened. It was gruesome the section that killed the student, but the rest of the body was just as healthy looking as any other person that age. I looked over the body for a good ten minutes, because I found it fascinating. I think RS and AK might have done that or something similar not out of maliciousness, just curiosity, and they have tried to cover up that aspect, which has created problems in their alibis. Anymore involvement at the moment I found too difficult to believe, unless RG had given a credible statement in today's proceedings.
There are probably many more discrepancies in AK and RS statements/actions, but I am tired and worn out. I would really like to read transcripts of the witnesses and suspect testimony to the LE before the trial if that is available. One thing I have noticed in the cases I have followed is that many witnesses trial testimony does not match up to their initial and or follow-up statements. Willingham's wife's testimony/statement changed at least three times during the course of the investigation. People lie or make mistakes about their memories or what exactly they saw frequently in these types of investigations, but it does not mean they were guilty of the murder or capital crime being investigated. I bet if the police wanted to pin this on Infallibamena (my nickname for Filamena) or Giorgio Cocciaretto they could make basically the same case.
Does any else think Cocciaretto might have been involved? Idle speculation (which I should refrain), but while reading the MOT he gave off the David Harris vibe to me, fingering Amanda and Rudy (he was the only one that stated RG told AK that he liked her) if I am reading the report correctly. Again if I am reading the report correctly, he also did not live with guys downstairs and from the report seemed the closest to RG. If he was or was not involved, and I have no real reason to believe he was, I wonder if the boys in the apartment downstairs were investigated very thoroughly.
