Tell me how she was while she committed the murder. You know this for fact, then? Please tell me.
According to her murder conviction, Knox was violent in the attack on Meredith Kercher. Her short stories are also filled with violent imagery.
Tell me how she was while she committed the murder. You know this for fact, then? Please tell me.
He is a liar, then. A lying blogger.Professors are rather disappointed with the calibre of students these days, particularly points like: students expecting at least a B for showing up for class and an A for submitting assignments ... and all sorts of other funny things ... or students deciding that they want to submit a paper on a subject that is not part of the course material. I suspect professors all over the world are seeing funny things in the entitled modern day student.
However, that has nothing to do with Frank. He is a blogger and he was not beaten by police.
Yes, I believe she held the knife. Mignini once said, (before he placed her outside the room) "It was Amanda who dealt the fatal knife thrust." Yes, her short stories were clearly a precursor to this.According to her murder conviction, Knox was violent in the attack on Meredith Kercher. Her short stories are also filled with violent imagery.
He is a liar, then. A lying blogger.
Yes, I believe she held the knife. Mignini once said, (before he placed her outside the room) "It was Amanda who dealt the fatal knife thrust." Yes, her short stories were clearly a precursor to this.
ETA: Looks like sleight of hand trickery to me - hey wow, it really is a magic show! And here all this time I thought we were talking about science. :doh:
He ought to have said, "No. How could she be in the kitchen, and yet, deliver the fatal wound?". To say yes would seem to compromise his idea of her using any knife at all.After the trial was over, the prosecutor was asked if Knox could have been in the kitchen. In the edited version that CNN distributed, the prosecutor agreed that it was possible. I guess it was not probable, even though it was possible, since she was convicted of weilding the knife.
He ought to have said, "No. How could she be in the kitchen, and yet, deliver the fatal wound?". To say yes would seem to compromise his idea of her using any knife at all.
Yes, but what if she was, and then who delivered the fatal thrust? In the kitchen, Amanda is a non-violent, scared little female, alarmed at what the bad men are doing. Very different story than what convicted her, and from Mignini's closing arguments.It seems to me that prosecutors sometimes enjoy discussing the what if scenarios after a trial is done. What if Knox, per her statements, was in the kitchen with her fingers stuck in her ears while Meredith screamed while being raped and murdered.
Yes, but what if she was, and then who delivered the fatal thrust? In the kitchen, Amanda is a non-violent, scared little female, alarmed at what the bad men are doing. Very different story than what convicted her, and from Mignini's closing arguments.
Sure. Those weren't her first calls to MK. Her first call lasted 16 seconds, IIRC. Once you call someone and get no answer, you are more likely to make a hasty decision that no one is answering future calls.
It was probably careless on AK's fault, but not proof of consciousness of guilt. The short calls merely prove AK hung up without leaving additional messages.
ETA the answer to your other questions is probably just that AK didn't think to do so. Nobody said she is Sherlock Holmes.
BTW, SMK can answer for me any time.
They didn't think of it. Jeeze! You've had years to consider what they might have done. They were functioning in the moment.
Oxymoronic? No, it make Mignini seem like a moron. (I added this in an ETA to my other): This business of Mignini saying she may have been in the kitchen is very worrisome. Because some of us were taking very seriously his depiction of Amanda as charged in the indictment: As a masculine, aggressive, knife-wielding killer. Not a feminine whimpering wreck in the kitchen, and who could call that a murderer?Non-violent scared female adult that does nothing while another woman is raped and murdered ... that seems like an oxymoron.
Oxymoronic? No, it make Mignini seem like a moron. (I added this in an ETA to my other): This business of Mignini saying she may have been in the kitchen is very worrisome. Because some of us were taking very seriously his depiction of Amanda as charged in the indictment: As a masculine, aggressive, knife-wielding killer. Not a feminine whimpering wreck in the kitchen, and who could call that a murderer?
Why so? Did it ever occur to you that she might fear being next? In any case, I say AK was either not there at all, or she wielded the knife. No kitchen scenario for me. (BTW, do not think that I do not catch what you are throwing my way. You believe that I am advocating doing nothing while a woman is raped and murdered. I catch your drift, but will not bite the bait...)I think it is interesting that some people still like the idea that a woman who is standing next to the exit, but who does nothing while a woman is raped an murdered down the hall about 15 feet away, is a nice woman ... rather shocking, actually.
It is also the only source that claims RG being a police informant based on..eehh... inside information or something. Pretty weird.Exactly. It is a rag mag and the Nov. 25, 2007 article is filled with errors, but because it is the one and only media link containing the allegation that Patrick was beaten by police, it keeps surfacing as being a factual article.
The issue isn't whether you blindly agree with posters who believe AK and RS to be innocent. The issue is acknowledging other posters when they respond to you. The issue is not misquoting other posters and then continuing to do so even when you have been corrected. The issue is not misrepresenting the positions of other posters so they constantly have to defend themselves for things they never wrote.
None of this has anything to do with some sort of noble refusal to "drink Kool-Aid." That's just one more misrepresentation.
It is also the only source that claims RG being a police informant based on..eehh... inside information or something. Pretty weird.
Non-violent scared female adult that does nothing while another woman is raped and murdered ... that seems like an oxymoron.
The dailymail article has been floating around since a couple of weeks after the murder. The content has never been corroborated or repeated by any news outlet, witness, or courtroom. I think it is fair to assume that the content is not true. Still, that article is dragged out every few months and we repeat the same old discussion.