:great:I should have added that I also don't expect our European posters to know the difference between the Globe and the San Francisco Examiner. If necessary, we North Americans will be happy to explain.
:great:I should have added that I also don't expect our European posters to know the difference between the Globe and the San Francisco Examiner. If necessary, we North Americans will be happy to explain.
Yes, but what if she was, and then who delivered the fatal thrust? In the kitchen, Amanda is a non-violent, scared little female, alarmed at what the bad men are doing. Very different story than what convicted her, and from Mignini's closing arguments.
ETA: This business of Mignini saying she may have been in the kitchen is very worrisome. Because some of us were taking very seriously his depiction of Amanda as charged in the indictment: As a masculine, aggressive, knife-wielding killer. Not a feminine whimpering wreck in the kitchen, and who could call that a murderer?
:laugh:Excellent point. Because if the prosecution believes it's possible that she could have been in the kitchen, then they have to GIVE UP THE KNIFE. We have no dna from RG or RS on it, so out the window knife.
And IF she was in the kitchen the whole time, then that also means the prosecution was making up stuff when they tried to make the knife the murder weapon. There's all sorts of problems with Mig saying AK was in the kitchen.
Unless...they decide she's the one who cleaned the dirty knife for one of the others, and cleaned it so well that it left "dna" from both her and kercher but magically removed the culprit's DNA.
Yeah, it's possible...just like big foot...
Oxymoronic? No, it make Mignini seem like a moron. (I added this in an ETA to my other): This business of Mignini saying she may have been in the kitchen is very worrisome. Because some of us were taking very seriously his depiction of Amanda as charged in the indictment: As a masculine, aggressive, knife-wielding killer. Not a feminine whimpering wreck in the kitchen, and who could call that a murderer?
Weird....the initial theory presented by the prosecution specifically Mignini had her as slitting her throat.
We then get Mignini in his own words stating that she was "directing" this from another room
Yet we have no proof that she was even there the night of the murder. Sorry this logic continues to astound me and truly only undermines the pro-guilt argument
Funny how individuals are referring to the daily mail, when PL has actually sued PLE for being beaten.
I tend to lend more credence to his winning his suit against PLE. As well since you have followed this for 2 years I am quite certain you have seen the photos of the injuries he sustained
The cottage was broken into after the murder that is why there is taped off
He won the case regarding the spending 2 weeks in jail but being completely innocent... not being beaten.
Absolutely. But in Britain (not sure about other countries) our tabloid papers are renowned for just fabricating interviews on occasion, so you really never know what you're getting. Russell Brand does a really good stand up piece on this where he picks apart an article (might even be in the Mail) claiming that he got slapped by C-list celebrity Tamara Beckwith, who he had never even met!
The article even had quotes from Tamara (supposedly) about the incident.
The window was probably taped so if someone broke in, the tape would break, and they'd know the crime scene had been disturbed.
When the cottage was broken in to after the murder, the culprits climbed up over the door/grill of the downstairs flat, onto the balcony and in through the kitchen window. Hard to believe, but it is a confirmed fact that the following two break-ins at the cottage were as people would expect. Real burglars enter through the kitchen window. There was no spiderman, it was a staged break-in.
When the cottage was broken in to after the murder, the culprits climbed up over the door/grill of the downstairs flat, onto the balcony and in through the kitchen window. Hard to believe, but it is a confirmed fact that the following two break-ins at the cottage were as people would expect. Real burglars enter through the kitchen window. There was no spiderman, it was a staged break-in.
Otto, I actually heard that Lumamba was threatened and intimidated, not that he was beaten. I heard Frank Sfarzo was beaten. But I don't have sources on either of those. I wish I could see the info on his trial against the police.
QUOTE]
If you heard it somewhere ... that Lumumba and Frank were beaten ... perhaps you heard it here. I've heard that there is also a "Mary" on the forums that may be making unsubstaniated claims. Without solid information to contradict the fact that Lumumba did not allege this in his compensation request, there's really no reason to believe this singular, manufactured article. Alternatively, we could believe that everything in the article is factual ... meaning that Knox is of very poor character.
There is no "info ... against the police" in relation to the murder of Meredith Kercher. Allegations have been made that the investigation, forensic testing, prosecution, jury, Judge and evidence were anything from incompetent to corrupt, but what else is new when someone is desperate to get away with murder. Next thing you know we'll have a lying prisoner circus with promises of sex changes and secret payments. Wait a minute ... that already happened.
1) Judge Micheli said climbing through that window would not take a spiderman.
2) The window of the lawyers office he broke into looks just as complicated.
But, point taken that it is atypical to break in that way. The counter would be, is Rudy an atypical burglar? i.e. it is atypical for a burglar to not burgle things, but Rudy has also been proven to do that as well.
I'm confused, isn't the kitchen on the other side of the house? Actually, does it even have a window?