Elisaa444
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 499
- Reaction score
- 1,333
YES! I was hoping the state would ask for her answer to be read back. I was so surprised he let that go when she back tracked about the gun being taken away. When the state said he was finished I was also surprised. I thought he could have finished stronger.Cross exam was underwhelming. The state showed she’s a self-absorbed and negligent parent. He also touched on what happened the night before the shooting but left it hanging. EC made a video on his phone saying what he was going to do the next day. State alleged they locked him out of the house but she denied that was true. She said his gun was taken away and then denied it when he came back to that a couple minutes later. She admitted he was distraught that evening. What happened the night before the shooting? The state buried the lede. It seemed like her saying they took his gun away was monumental. Because why would they if they weren’t concerned about him hurting himself or others???? They clearly didn’t take his phone away. They locked him out and took his gun away because he was acting out of control maybe? I wish state had asked her answer be played back when she DID say they took his gun away. I’m sure he will argue that in closing!
JMO
Moo/Moo