NYArtist
Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 7
I'm still hoping, but it isn't easy.
I've been following missing persons cases for a long, long time, and no case has ever hurt like this one because I've never come across a victim like Dani. She is one of those extraordinarily rare people who make the world worth living in.
I allowed myself to get my hopes up in part because of the initial police statement: "The reason she is missing is not the issue. The concern is for her safety." That comment seems incredibly cruel in retrospect because it misled me--and misled a lot of people, I think--into believing that a voluntary disappearance was a possibility.
I, as you, have this statement embedded in my mind that allows me to feel that "they" know why she is missing and are only interested in if she is safe. Her disappearance was planned and because of what "they" know, is now taking a turn in a direction that was not planned or expected. Proper connections may have gotten intercepted. This has always been my feeling,but so many other possibilities have surfaced, it more or less pushed this main thought to the back of my mind. It keeps nudging me and telling me, "no these other things that have come up are not what happened". What is the real reason her plans were intercepted??
Of course being that this is just my opinion nagging at me, I can not prove any of this to be factual.