hockeymom4
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
- Messages
- 3,468
- Reaction score
- 7
No, this is what MIMOMMY said:
"There are no reports of water in her lungs, therefore we can assume she was not drowned."
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-Ypsilanti-Dec-2012-2&p=11569843#post11569843
Water or no water in her lungs, cause of death was ruled "asphyxiation associated with drowning". She was alive when submerged in the water.
"She was not deceased (beforehand,") Yuhas said. "It's never been determined (if she was unconscious.) But, she was definitely asphyxiated and then drowned."
http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2013/11/julia_niswender.html
I am now a million percent lost. how can one have not have water in their lungs and drown?
Edit: I feel like I am spinning in circles. As I said, the VI stated there was no water in the lungs. That is what she said. "There are no reports of water in her lungs." Based on what LE has stated, this logically to me makes no sense.