JT knows from personal experience that police can arrest you without having "hard evidence". As we know now, police had no proof that the *advertiser censored* found on the computer involved minors, that it was downloaded deliberately or that it had been downloaded by JT. This was after cooperating with LE and handing over the computer.
I think there is legitimate concern that he might get arrested again if he did sit down with LE and make a formal statement. The detectives might say that it would be suspicious if he did not recall his exact whereabouts nearly three years ago. I think it is unlikely that police would unnamed him POI after making a formal statement, because there is always room for lingering suspicion.
I don't think we should question the motives of the people here at websleuths. We are all here to find Julia's murderer.
That's right, they could not prove how it got there but it was there. It is my understanding of the verdict and if correct that verdict did not pertain to the presence of *advertiser censored* on the computer. It was merely deciding if JT put it there and that could not be proved.
Now a minor child is in the same house where the *advertiser censored* was found so people have a very valid reason for being concerned. Everyone seems to stay focused on JT's Not Guilty verdict. It means nothing because JT is now living in the same house of the minor child where *advertiser censored* was found. Regardless of his verdict *advertiser censored* is still a risk at being present on the computers within that household.
One glaring fact is this same man is considered POI in the death of his stepdaughter. He should not be allowed living with minor children, even his own until his name is cleared.
Not exactly....I bet JT remembers that pleasant phone call with Julia on Dec. 9th and even the time he called.
Feb. 16, 2013 - JT agrees to another interview by investigators the upcoming week but requested a few days notice.
Feb. 19, 2013 - This day is when it all starts to unravel and an interesting read of LE notes.
Feb. 23, 2013 - JT does a private lie detector lie at a private investigations company and passed. Of course, none of us how long or how many times they did this time but the report showed to the world stated he passed.
This could be where JT uses up his "A Few Days Notice" pass because on..
Feb. 25, 2013 - JT takes a LE lie detector lie and it was determined by the test administer he was being truthful.
Feb. 25, 2013 - Jt's attorney called LE stating JT would no longer be submitting a formal statement.
Feb. 25, 2013 - JT stopped the investigation.
Feb. 26, 2015 - JT is arrested on *advertiser censored* charges.
He had two years and a few days notice to clear his name. I'm not accepting his silence. LE needs answers and they believe JT knows something. They never said he killed Julia only that he knows something about her death. What's the harm of talking to LE if you are innocent? Or is there something to hide?
It's a homicide investigation into his stepdaughter's death and I hope LE doesn't ever stop questioning people about Julia's death. None of us should stop asking until all the pieces fit and the truth is known.
If we don't question motives, we don't find the truth.
In closing, I'm quite sure you have missed me and those witty last statements declaring the above to be IMHO only. I would like to add that it is not all IMHO and some is fact based upon information provided in the Search Warrant that one can link directly on Page 1 of Julia's Threads 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Until next time, friend....:loveyou:
