E-U-R
New Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 249
- Reaction score
- 0
agreed reporters really don't do that much fact checking these days but this could be twisted and perhaps the clothes were inside but not on the body... if she was undressed still this suggests no remorse of the killer and makes you wonder what type of person would undress a child.... if you think that putting a body in cement is a fail proof way to get rid of it then you would probably assume the clothes should be disposed of that way as well... but not the receipts from the purchase because those could have prints you would want to make sure those were rendered destroyedThese days it seems as if all the media reports are inconsistant. It causes confusion, then much later on we sometimes quote a report that turned out not to be true or at least factual.
I wish the writers of these articles would double check their facts when writing about this sort of thing. Example: Nevaeh was clothed in clothing similiar to those she was wearing when she disappeared. Then in the Fox tape we hear that Nevaeh was found unclothed.
This is just too serious and too sad for reporters to just throw things out there without checking for the real facts! Which one should we believe?
OK, I am done now. Sorry.
JMO