The charge is possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. So no previous convictions are necessary with that charge.
Well, that's frustrating :banghead:
The charge is possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. So no previous convictions are necessary with that charge.
Respectfully, I disagree. Where she was beforehand has nothing to do with whether the homeowner acted properly in the eyes of the law. For example, if a woman is raped, what she was wearing isn't relevant. The same concept applies here. While Renisha's actions at the homeowner's house is relevant in determining whether the homeowner acted appropriately, what she was doing before the accident isn't.
I disagree, her behavior at his home is very important. She was so high she caused a high impact accident with a parked car. lost 3 hrs. No telling what the hell she did at his house to cause him to shoot. I stand behind him. But I thought Zimmerman was guilty too.
imo, if I live where this guy did, on the border of Detroit, there's a 95-100% chance that someone trying my doors at 3:40 a.m. is a criminal. Most likely a home invasion or minimum a burglary with a weapon. Like I said, I would never live there voluntarily. But if you DO live there, imo, you can't be faulted for reaching the most likely conclusion about why someone's trying to get into your house in the wee hours. Whether this shooting was accidental, justified or otherwise, is the only question in my mind. I have no doubt that the homeowner thought he was in grave danger, even though it fortuitously turned out he probably was not. jmo
I am splitting it down the middle. I am sitting in that grey area somewhere in between.
I feel her actions and behaviors while on the homeowner's property may be very relevant and factor into his decision to shoot. I feel her actions prior to the shooting, before she set foot on his property, including who she drank and partied with and where is completely irrelevant as the homeowner had no way of knowing any of that and therefor THAT info could NOT be a factor in his response.
Still not read all of the posts yet, but this one caught my eye whilst scrolling.
I don't think this is limited to "On the border or Detroit", I think it applies anywhere you may live. Yes, Detroit can be a hellhole, but a home invasion can happen just about anywhere.
BTW, I do not live here voluntarily either (north of Detroit, but I have lived closer to the city in my lifetime). I would much prefer a nice island of my own somewhere, or perhaps a villa in Bellagio, Italy :seeya:
Still not read all of the posts yet, but this one caught my eye whilst scrolling.
I don't think this is limited to "On the border or Detroit", I think it applies anywhere you may live. Yes, Detroit can be a hellhole, but a home invasion can happen just about anywhere.
BTW, I do not live here voluntarily either (north of Detroit, but I have lived closer to the city in my lifetime). I would much prefer a nice island of my own somewhere, or perhaps a villa in Bellagio, Italy :seeya:
imo, if I live where this guy did, on the border of Detroit, there's a 95-100% chance that someone trying my doors at 3:40 a.m. is a criminal. Most likely a home invasion or minimum a burglary with a weapon. Like I said, I would never live there voluntarily. But if you DO live there, imo, you can't be faulted for reaching the most likely conclusion about why someone's trying to get into your house in the wee hours. Whether this shooting was accidental, justified or otherwise, is the only question in my mind. I have no doubt that the homeowner thought he was in grave danger, even though it fortuitously turned out he probably was not. jmo
Karmady, with all due respect, I work in Detroit and have roots going back several generations. Whichever post said they were raised in Garden City, so was my mother! My father was raised in Redford (both of my parents were born in Detroit, as was I).
While I do understand the bad rap that Detroit gets, it is not any worse than any number of large cities across the country.
Those of us on the board who know Detroit, can attest to the fact that there are many, many good things about the city.
I agree with you. I think it's true that in most places someone trying your doors at 3 in the morning would lead you to the same conclusion. I guess I was just thinking that if you live where he did, it's probably something you think or worry about on a regular basis. Where I live right now, I don't worry about it or even think about it much. But, you're right, if someone was outside my front door like that my first thought would still be that I was in danger.
And I'm with ya on the island or the villa. Unfortunately, not to be in this lifetime :tantrum: