Whisper2112
Verified Advocate for the Missing
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2014
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 120
Can anyone identify any info that could be used to revive this case?
Putting posters in Maple Grove is one option.
What else is there?
I find the paucity of information very unusual.
I think that sharing the case much more widely would be helpful. Maple Grove is a very small focus for a case that is this old, and where there have been reported sightings outside the state.
Also, looking at other events of missing persons and other crimes in the area could shed some new light. It's unfortunate that the responding officer went to the home rather than to the scene to take the report, and that there was not an immediate canvass for possible witnesses, and no video footage of the scene at the time was collected.
Still, looking at the surrounding area, we can still "see" things that could suggest new areas of inquiry.
The County fair was going on near that time, so people would not necessarily be alerted to "strangers" in the area. There would have been a lot more unusual activity ,and people coming and going from the area.
We know of at least one other missing person's case that happened within fifteen days of Amy going missing, so it could be possible to explore if there is a possible relation to that. There was a landowner who lived in Maple Grove at the time who owned several problem properties in Minneapolis who was under indictment for tax fraud, there was a suicide of a young man around that time, there were numerous incidences of vandalism with BB guns, and there was a gun incident at the school that Amy attended...
It seems like there were a lot of things going on in Maple Grove that could tie in to the circumstances surrounding Amy's disappearance. Nothing as "smoking gun" as the Paynesville attacks, but still, could shed some light on possible theories of the crime.
I have put the info up on some of these, and intend to find out more about them. For a little longer, I will probably continue to share them here, but if nobody else is interested, I'll probably not waste my time.
For now, though, given that there have been so many investigators on this case, it just doesn't seem likely that they are all incompetent, and have failed to put together some critical bit of information regarding Amy's home and immediate relationships. Especially given the effort two years ago, and the police say the family has been cooperative.
It is not outside the possibility that a new officer (one of the articles mentioned that) made a bad report, but it's pretty inconceivable that every detective on the case since the beginning has failed to uncover information about a cooperative family.
There is probably something out there that can shed some light...but it's not going to be on the well-traveled road, in my opinion.