Omg this is so painful to watch! Both of them! We get it! Resuscitative efforts must be done quickly. She asked the same question 5 times!!
They probably thought at first they were still restraining him. The initial call was that he had an "injury to his mouth," so they wouldn't have known his true condition.
I think he's okay too, but could be stronger with better questioning. She didn't do a good job of telling the narrative through his testimony.Personally I think he's an okay witness... <modsnip> He's done well to answer her annoying way of posing questions. MOO.
Have you arrived on scene and noticed officers on top of a person before
Witness “yes”
Objection didn’t hear whether it was overruled or sustained!
Have you arrived on scene and noticed officers on top of a person before
Witness “yes”
Objection didn’t hear whether it was overruled or sustained!
Why does Nelson keep referring to the call as an "overdose call?" I thought it was a non emergency code 2 call initially? The second call was a code 3 (life threatening situation) because he wasn't responsive, right?Police will frequently go to scene before paramedic to control scene
Witness “yes”
Have you been to overdose calls before
Witness “yes”
Have police responded first
Witness yes
Question about violence - objection overfilled
“have personally seen violence after a drug overdose”
Witness “yes”
They need to counter question with "have you ever arrived on the scene and noticed officers on top of someone who had no pulse before?"