All theory on my part. I highly doubt there will be POI's named from St. John's because alibis for the various priests for the nights when abductions/assaults occurred were never investigated. A meager effort was made for the Guimond case only long after the fact. Pinecurtain offers some info about these cases that in my opinion merits further thought. DR is still a "POI" but apparently not enough concrete evidence was found to charge him, not even after three rounds of extensive digging. But they never did any digging at St. John's -- and not because there were not any suspicions. My thoughts are from standing back and looking at that area and what any common denominators might be, as well as what has and has not been examined so far. As I've said before, no one has been given access to Sheriff Sanner's files, in spite of several inquiries. The sheriff was willing to pursue DR, but seemed very reluctant to look into legitimate concerns posed by others about certain monks. How could it be so easy to exclude potential connections to these assaults when so many monks in that location have extensive histories of child molestation? They were not monitored and not accountable to anyone. The fact that their criminal behavior was covered up and lied about for so long in spite of numerous young victims coming forward adds to my concern. Incoming conjecture -- I believe that in spite of what has been uncovered so far, it may be the tip of the iceberg. Why? Because if an organization is that willing to deceive and hide such despicable behavior for so long, in my opinion they are willing to cover up many things. With regard to the possibility of someone associated with the abbey having information -- again, conjecture on my part, but I believe someone there may have seen or heard things and chose to look the other way. A lot of that goes on there and it always has.