CoolJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 4,241
- Reaction score
- 2,132
As I said, a young boy...Just to clarify the age: he was 18.
As I said, a young boy...Just to clarify the age: he was 18.
No, he did not say punched, but he did say it was a serious interaction at the car. Then he went on to say what matters is what happened next. Megyn Kelly asked why he thought a cop with no disciplinary actions would shoot and kill a person 6 times- he said he guesses because the altercation at the car made him mad.
Keep the political snark out of your posts on this thread. There is a political thread in the private area. Vent there, not here.
As I said, a young boy...
That's just the point... Why are you assuming the officer was assaulted and had his weapon stolen.... The only person who has said that was an anonymous caller on a radio talk show providing what they said was a 3rd hand account...That's unfortunate, obviously but if you assault an officer and try to steal his weapon, the officer has every right to protect himself and save his own life. I have no doubt that if Mike would have succeeded in getting Wilson's gun, it would be Wilson dead right now. IMO
If you insist, it sounded that way to me.
Still just a boy18- a legal adult. Old enough to vote, drive, go to war, and to prison.
Yes...
And that Wilson kept shooting cause "he was mad."
Megyn Kelly on now- Daryl Parks says there's no doubt there was a "in all due fairness", "serious situation that took place between the officer and Michael, without question". hmm...
That's unfortunate, obviously but if you assault an officer and try to steal his weapon, the officer has every right to protect himself and save his own life. I have no doubt that if Mike would have succeeded in getting Wilson's gun, it would be Wilson dead right now. IMO
Had the same experience with my 17 year old daughter.
She kept saying, "but it's on Instagram" we had a long talk
I walked in at the end, she said it had to be "walked back"
I don't see anything on that women's twitter, I don't see a retraction.
Oh man gump is on now, he's admitting a "serious altercation" occurred at the car, Michael punched him and a shot went off."
When she said "but why would Wilson just shoot him like that?"
To which gump said, "I'm guessing b/c he was mad."
He believes there will be an indictment, "b/c there is enough evidence"
When Megan said, "but the defense doesn't get to defend himself"
He replied, "so"
When asked what if there is no indictment, I couldn't make out a word he said. Guy seriously mumbles.
Earlier she had on a police rep, who said the reason they haven't released an incident report is b/c they don't release them.
Nice. So I guess we can expect for that info to be released soon.
Yes definitely allowed to have opinions. That is fine but there are no facts available to us right now other than an unarmed boy was shot to death. We haven't even heard from the officer. It just irks me that people are making assumptions.... for reasons I don't even want to fathom. Regardless, there are many many victims in this case but no matter how you slice it Big Mike and his family are at the top of that list! IMO
I'm not talking about some anonymous radio person, I'm talking about this:That's just the point... Why are you assuming the officer was assaulted and had his weapon stolen.... The only person who has said that was an anonymous caller on a radio talk show providing what they said was a 3rd hand account...
Chief Jon Belmar with the St. Louis County Police Department said a struggle over a Ferguson officer's gun led to Michael Brown's death.
Belmar says Brown physically assaulted the officer, and during a struggle between the two, Brown reached for the officer's gun. One shot was fired in the car followed by other gunshots outside of the car.