Amicable Dissolution of Marriage?
.... His divorce wasn’t just amicable, he literally waived appearance, letting his wife set the terms as she had let him the first time.
snipped for focus.
@Jojefos Some docket entries make me wonder about how amicable the Dis/Mar #2 was.
1.
The LAPSE OF TIME from April 12, 2022 petition filing (by Penny Lynn's atty) to May 10, 2023 "Judgment on Dissolution." * That's 13 MONTHS.*
Does anything on the docket indicate reason for lapse of time?
After July 29, 2022 docket entry, nothing else til April 13, 2023. Why?
Were the parties & her atty discussing $$$?
If this separation was amicable, was there a need for extended negotiating, for 8 1/2 months? Or was there a stand-off w one party refusing to communicate on the subject?
IDK
Compare w their first Dis/Mar** timing: April 29, 2019 petition filing (by Dr F.'s atty) to June 4, 2019 D/M decree, or ONE MONTH (well, 5 weeks) later.
In that proceeding, the parties submitted a separation agreement to the court, w legal description of real properties divided, as shown on the June 4, 2019 docket entry re decree.
2.
Possible Difficulty in Serving Dr. F?
July 29, 2022 Docket entry.
Summons to serve him w petition, "non est"
For a 3 month plus period, server could not locate him (IIRC from docket entry)?????
Why? Was he - a physician working at a local hosp.'s ER - dodging the process server, or was process server given bad address/info, or am I misunderstanding this entry?
There may be perfectly good reasons for the two ^ points, but they caught my attn. imo
________________________________
* Dissolution of Marriage #1.
https://www.courts.mo.gov/cnet/case...ber=22LW-DR00074&inputVO.coutrtId=CT39#docket
** Dissolution of Marriage #2.