alwaysonmymind
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,349
- Reaction score
- 4,870
I read it was improvements to an existing Starbucks. Those types of jobs are done at night to keep the business open (making money) during operating hours.
Was it established that those pictures of the bed were taken after LE was finished with the house? I didn't see that but I have to admit I have had a real hard time keeping up today!
Meeting a deadline?
I've gotten no work done and can't keep up with these threads tonight.
I could have sworn somewhere (and I don't have the patience right now to go thru all the threads) that someone had a said a year for her living there. Now if JI is in his late 20's, and he bought the house in 2002, he was quite young and prices were def. higher then.
I also thought ( again, sorry, i'm tired) that i found a Debra L Bradley that was born in 86, on that site posted in last post. She had a different address in 10 and then couldn't be served. Then address is listed as 'current one. Some records i found did not have BD's and it could be a different DB. I don't have the best sites for research, just used the MO court system.
And it was stated somewhere earlier that she was in her 20's too..... which would be the 86 date... So i'm very confused. She does look older.
Also, doesn't another relative live relatively close? I thought (and i promise i'll research better tomorrow) that there was another address given for JI a few years back. Not that it matters in a big way, just wondering about financial motives.
Sorry for the rambling..... i just can't stop thinking about this lil one tonight.
Really want Mom and Dad to work with LE...... with or without lawyers.
I think ABC is incorrect on the time she gave the baby the bottle.
That makes sense. I sure thought that she looked older than 35 but Jeremy looks much older than her. Thanks for this info.
It cost a heck of a lot of money to hire contractors to do jobs at night, especially 3rd shift.
I have a new Starbucks less than a mile from where I live. Construction work wasn't done at night.
imo
MyBelle,
I agree. Makes no sense. As someone said earlier today, kidnappers don't look down a street and say-hey let's go to the house that's well lighted, kidnap their baby and steal their cell phones.
A real kidnapper would say let's get the baby and get the he double L outta here.
imo
Say the 'kidnapper' came through the bedroom window pictured above, did the kidnapper step on the baby swing? Did the kidnapper touch the crib?
I'm trying to ask--did LE finger print that room?
imo
What would you expect LE would find by testing the bedding?
Does anyone know if Jeremy wanted the graveyard shift or if it was his boss who asked him to do this? I suspect this was a team operation.
Actually, I'm wondering if these are two separate pieces of information given by JI and DB at different interviews. She said she left the door unlocked and he said the window didn't look right. ?
The crib should have been considered the main part of a crime scene since the mom stated that was the last place Lisa was seen. It should have been tested for fibers, blood, DNA and fingerprints.
LE changed the emphasis of the case by leaking negative "facts" about the mom - and that on top of their self-serving press conference yesterday; I've not heard LE using airtime for much else lately. The parents have to defend themselves because the public will quickly lose interest in helping to find baby Lisa if they buy into the "parents did it" campaign and come to believe the child is dead.Well, mom and dad are no longer pleading for the 'kidnapper' to return their baby to a safe place unless media has been editing that part out all day, but can't imagine they would. Reminds me of Cindy and George when they claimed Caylee was a missing child yet you could tell they knew that wasn't true. Using 99% of airtime defending yourself is very telling if you ask me.
Do people actually ask for graveyard vs swing?
Do people actually ask for graveyard vs swing?