MS - Jessica Chambers, 19, found burned near her car, Panola County, 6 Dec 2014 - #4

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Losing it!

Can anyone point me to the MSM report of the shooting the other day with 2 fatalities? Any update? I can't find anything for the life of me. :seeya:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I posted that before having my coffee yesterday morning, thinking it was current news, but it was three months old so it went bye-bye to eliminate confusion.

That must be why. Was it the Hilltop shooting incident? I thought it happened Thursday of Friday. Guess not.:crazy:


I was referring to a shooting outside of Courtland, MS. :cool:
 
Link to my previous post
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-near-her-car-Panola-County-Dec-2014-4/page10

i believe the key is the the last person to have knowlege or to have talked to her or conveniently been in the same location or had knowledge of Jessica's last whereabouts.

The last known person to acknowledged passing by the crime scene was going fishing at Lake Enid. Please read the USA Today article linked in my previous post.

I want to understand if it seems likely that was the route anglers use to fish at Lake Enid or was she lured to that spot (party)or is fishing a ruse or alibi or was there something more nefarious happening?

Last night my poor husband who is an electrical engineer( & does not understand my passion for this website )had to go to bed because I would not shut up.:smile:

Thanks for reading my post. MOO
 
There is no way some stranger came into that town and lingered at that gas station with that local crowd and no one saw 'him/her/them'.

Didn't happen.

Going by logical thinking, if a stranger did come in and linger and target, what would the motivating factor be for the locals to go silent about it? There would be none. They would all remember who, what, where.

Going further by logical thinking and the motivating factor to be silent is fear? Think to the elementary playground and a bully is there with his/her little pack of followers. Even at a young age the followers KNOW that if they snitch on the bully they will be in trouble with the bully.

So now, switch your attention and extrapolate this out further. Who has the power in this town? Who is the strong arm?

All of this is just logical thinking.

Excellent post right there!
 
So, are people alleging a S. W. and Jessica Chambers were seeing each other recently? (Trying hard not to go against posting rules)
 
Link to my previous post
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-near-her-car-Panola-County-Dec-2014-4/page10

i believe the key is the the last person to have knowlege or to have talked to her or conveniently been in the same location or had knowledge of Jessica's last whereabouts.

The last known person to acknowledged passing by the crime scene was going fishing at Lake Enid. Please read the USA Today article linked in my previous post.

I want to understand if it seems likely that was the route anglers use to fish at Lake Enid or was she lured to that spot (party)or is fishing a ruse or alibi or was there something more nefarious happening?

Last night my poor husband who is an electrical engineer( & does not understand my passion for this website )had to go to bed because I would not shut up.:smile:

Thanks for reading my post. MOO

Enid Lake is nowhere near Herron Road. The only reason one would use Herron in the area of the fire is if they lived west or northwest of that area.
 
ADMIN NOTE:

Posting personal observations about a geographical location is fine.

With rare exceptions, seeking out a particular individual to engage in conversation, and then posting about it, is not.

Please move on.

Thanks.
 
Enid Lake is nowhere near Herron Road. The only reason one would use Herron is if they lived in that area.

Well,if that is true then I can think of one person quoted in the USA article that needs to explain 'why was she goin' fishing at Lake Enid and what else could she have seen(enroute to fishing at Lake Enid)driving by 'a' crime scene.MOO
 
This is something I have noticed from following cases. After reading about a case, people will say how if it was their child, they would murder the killer in the most brutal way possible. Yet I can think of very few cases where a parent killed their child's killer, and usually, it was in the moment, such as the guy who killed the man who raped his daughter. Another thing is, people always say how if their child was missing, they would be running down the street naked, anything to get attention, yet I never see parents doing anything "crazy" to get media coverage.

I'm new to posting. Lurked on many many many many threads on ws. Finally joined after reading more than a few 'lurkers, come join us.' So, I did and here I am. Bessie, you do seriously rawk :). I've lurked way more than enough to know that :).

I absolutely have to comment on this post. I know exactly what you mean. I'm big on empathy and with every case I read about I'm like 'what would I do?' And I've tried to put my hypothetical actions into words and it's not even possible for me. And when I read "if it were me/my relative, then I'd do this, or I'd do that" I get so so frustrated, because I'm thinking to myself 'okay, so why aren't you? (general you) otherwise, even displaying that thought -in whatever way (spoken or written)- is adding more grief to those grieving. And John Malkovich (sp?) said it soooooo perfectly in the movie Alive. He does a monologue where he talks about this very thing so eloquently. I re-watched this movie last week (hey, it was the only thing on, don't hate, lol) and when he was done with that part I just had to thank my tv cuz it was so awesome the way he put it. Should be the first vid on YT when typing in 'John Malkovich, Alive.' Idk if posting YT links is kosher, so Imma go with giving a description vs a link, hoping I'm safe. And it's not hard to find.

But, yeah, I'm all for empathy. But, adding more grief to those grieving (by telling them how to react, or 'if it were me Id do yada yada' or what have you), I am definitely against. It just equals more unneeded stress.
 
Enid Lake is nowhere near Herron Road. The only reason one would use Herron in the area of the fire is if they lived west or northwest of that area.

Is Enid Lake the sort of fishing place that attracts fishermen from other areas? On the map, it looks fairly large.
 
Welcome, RedTinCan. Glad you came out of lurk mode. :)


:welcome5:
 
I'm new to posting. Lurked on many many many many threads on ws. Finally joined after reading more than a few 'lurkers, come join us.' So, I did and here I am. Bessie, you do seriously rawk :). I've lurked way more than enough to know that :).

I absolutely have to comment on this post. I know exactly what you mean. I'm big on empathy and with every case I read about I'm like 'what would I do?' And I've tried to put my hypothetical actions into words and it's not even possible for me. And when I read "if it were me/my relative, then I'd do this, or I'd do that" I get so so frustrated, because I'm thinking to myself 'okay, so why aren't you? (general you) otherwise, even displaying that thought -in whatever way (spoken or written)- is adding more grief to those grieving. And John Malkovich (sp?) said it soooooo perfectly in the movie Alive. He does a monologue where he talks about this very thing so eloquently. I re-watched this movie last week (hey, it was the only thing on, don't hate, lol) and when he was done with that part I just had to thank my tv cuz it was so awesome the way he put it. Should be the first vid on YT when typing in 'John Malkovich, Alive.' Idk if posting YT links is kosher, so Imma go with giving a description vs a link, hoping I'm safe. And it's not hard to find.

But, yeah, I'm all for empathy. But, adding more grief to those grieving (by telling them how to react, or 'if it were me Id do yada yada' or what have you), I am definitely against. It just equals more unneeded stress.

FANTASTIC first post. :welcome: to WS! :fireworks:
 
I'm new to posting. Lurked on many many many many threads on ws. Finally joined after reading more than a few 'lurkers, come join us.' So, I did and here I am. Bessie, you do seriously rawk :). I've lurked way more than enough to know that :).

I absolutely have to comment on this post. I know exactly what you mean. I'm big on empathy and with every case I read about I'm like 'what would I do?' And I've tried to put my hypothetical actions into words and it's not even possible for me. And when I read "if it were me/my relative, then I'd do this, or I'd do that" I get so so frustrated, because I'm thinking to myself 'okay, so why aren't you? (general you) otherwise, even displaying that thought -in whatever way (spoken or written)- is adding more grief to those grieving. And John Malkovich (sp?) said it soooooo perfectly in the movie Alive. He does a monologue where he talks about this very thing so eloquently. I re-watched this movie last week (hey, it was the only thing on, don't hate, lol) and when he was done with that part I just had to thank my tv cuz it was so awesome the way he put it. Should be the first vid on YT when typing in 'John Malkovich, Alive.' Idk if posting YT links is kosher, so Imma go with giving a description vs a link, hoping I'm safe. And it's not hard to find.

But, yeah, I'm all for empathy. But, adding more grief to those grieving (by telling them how to react, or 'if it were me Id do yada yada' or what have you), I am definitely against. It just equals more unneeded stress.

Cool. Great timing and thoughts. Thanks you for pitching in and welcome.
 
This is something I have noticed from following cases. After reading about a case, people will say how if it was their child, they would murder the killer in the most brutal way possible. Yet I can think of very few cases where a parent killed their child's killer, and usually, it was in the moment, such as the guy who killed the man who raped his daughter. Another thing is, people always say how if their child was missing, they would be running down the street naked, anything to get attention, yet I never see parents doing anything "crazy" to get media coverage.

With respect, I disagree.

In most of these cases the person, if caught, is in protective custody and therefore the families are unable to get to them. Think back to all the photos and video you have seen of the hated criminals coming too and from the jail for court and they have bullet proof vests on, guards surrounding them ect...

So, it's not that the families don't want to follow through, they simply are unable to follow through. Also they are told by law enforcement if they act out, they will go to jail themselves.

There are many cases I can think of that made the news where the family sits in the courtroom and cannot take it anymore and begin to rise from their seats but are escorted out or told to sit back down.

I do not believe it is a lack of will, it's a lack of opportunity.

As far as the missing child goes, that also is incorrect. Adam Walsh's father became famous for his pursuit, Polly Klaus' father as well. The definition of 'crazy' probably isn't the best suited for someone's activities in this tragic event.



Never underestimate the power and instinct of a parent. I cannot think of any other human beings on this earth that I would more aggressively, instantly and without hesitation put my life on the line to save theirs, than my own children.
 
Congratulations for coming out of 'Lurking Land'!! RedTinCan


:Banane49::welcome6::christmastree:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
1,495
Total visitors
1,565

Forum statistics

Threads
606,658
Messages
18,207,664
Members
233,920
Latest member
charity4668
Back
Top