I don't think there is credible evidence that it was Tutor.
I do not see credible evidence that it was anyone in particular at this point, just a lot of suspicious behavior on just about everyone's part. JMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think there is credible evidence that it was Tutor.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't believe the look she gives is that of culpability to this crime itself.
All you have to do is listen to what he's saying and at the precise moment he says they were good friends she give a complete 'HA' type scoff to indicate that she knows better.
Her look is a reaction to his statement. It is quite clear.
She herself in the video says they had their disagreements and ups and downs. So she has already admitted on camera that they were not the best of friends.
I want to be a ' raison d'etre' Geez Around here I'm just a sandwich maker and clothes washer.
Yeah - there is also the Stockholm syndrome, if he has a lot of control over her for whatever reason.
I think she might work as an associate in human resources for Mr. Mister. MOOWhat I find paradoxical in Mister and Tudor's exchange is this ~ She gives all indications through her words, eyes and body language that she is being submissive. But then she is the bold one who bursts out, almost challengingly, with that "lovers' quarrel" comment. Kinda enforced the idea that they might be a pair, imo, but not committed. :dunno:
we talked about this earlier, "lovers quarrel" is not their words to describe things, they are repeating what LE asked them.
Idk if this one has been posted. Nothing really new it. This is the only article I've seen for today.
http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story...family-prepare-to-spend-christmas-without-her
What I find paradoxical in Mister and Tudor's exchange is this ~ She gives all indications through her words, eyes and body language that she is being submissive. But then she is the bold one who bursts out, almost challengingly, with that "lovers' quarrel" comment. Kinda enforced the idea that they might be a pair, imo, but not committed. :dunno:
file this in the "complete speculation and aimed at nobody in particular" bin...
people that use highly addictive drugs will often find themselves attached to all manner of strange partners that can supply said drugs...
pppppppfffffffftttttt....Gave up. Now I just go to the zoo. Talk to the animals.
i guess im going to be the contrarian tonight (always?) but i dont think we have enough evidence to say we know that she named her killer, she is reported to have said a name, the exact name she said we are not certain of, and any context that she said it in (if there was any) we do not know.
Exactly. I would hope if she named the assailant or assailants, they would have been arrested by now. But, then again, LE could be building a case.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mr. Mister is a keen observer of life. He is fully aware of who is obedient and how that will assist him in his daily activities.
go to that video of him and watch him as he turns his head and looks into the camera.
Then why is Mr. Mister still on the street? JMO