Madeleine74
Knower of Things
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,081
As for what would it take to convince a jury of QT's guilt, I believe in this case and with jurors in this geographical location, it would take something like his hand print in her blood, mixed with gasoline, on a couple items, and that's just for starters. Less intelligent jurors don't understand inference and how powerful circumstantial evidence really is when you have a lot of it.
In addition, I think it would take a couple eye witnesses, and someone who heard QT talk about the murder and admit it, along with the kind of physical evidence that cannot be denied.
Digital evidence seems to go over the head of less educated jurors. They don't get it so they end up tuning it out.
Anyway, even with all that, the "Eric" issue is a problem that doesn't get solved.
In addition, I think it would take a couple eye witnesses, and someone who heard QT talk about the murder and admit it, along with the kind of physical evidence that cannot be denied.
Digital evidence seems to go over the head of less educated jurors. They don't get it so they end up tuning it out.
Anyway, even with all that, the "Eric" issue is a problem that doesn't get solved.