And I also agree with the point that all this extracting of store receipts is a moot point IF someone/anyone saw NC running that morning. But so far no one has seen her or said they saw her that day, outside of her husband. So now hub is trying to show what he did (to a point of course), what he purchased, and (I believe) is trying to see what 'info' HT has about him, his visits, and what he purchased, when and where.
IF he didn't have anything to hide, he wouldn't care what LE found, because he was INNOCENT. IMO, the FACT that he DID go to the grocery store to obtain copies of his receipts, says volumes. IMO, LE heard it, LOUD and clear!
That very first day of Nancy {missing}, LE's initial contact with the parties involved, EVERYTHING is noted. Every word. LE has a way of asking you the SAME question 10 different ways. Often times, you didn't even 'see' it was a question of something you'd already answered 4 or 5 times. Believe me, they play a hand-off game. One guy talks to you, you leave and get a drink of water, another guy engages you in conversation and you repeat .....or do you? :waitasec:
IF there's more than one person at the scene, LE has a way to unknowingly separate you. The person being questioned, often times doesn't even realize it was intentional. Oh, and that other officer sitting down making busy writing stuff down but within earshot of you, well..............he's not JUST concentrating on his writing material, ...................looking back you remembered when he slowly 1/2 turned towards your direction and well..........listened with one ear.
IF you're telling the TRUTH, your story remains pretty much the same. IF you're confused on the times, you may even stop, look at the clock, and even state, 'I'm not really sure, I didn't think at the time I would NEED to remember exactly, it wasn't important.'
IMO, Brad's story was MOST likely TOO thought out. Too consistant. Too detailed. Although LE
JUST WANTS THE FACTS!, a distressed person does NOT remember details, NOT minute facts, it just isn't the way an innocent person reacts in a stressful situation.
Brad returned to the store to SEE if the receipt was in HIS NAME. He just wasn't counting on the video. Sincerely, that IS going to be his downfall. Or the beginning of it. IMO, there already are, behind the scenes, contributing facts that will lead to, IMO, his eventual arrest of this crime.
Now Brad has to worry about all those lies he's told. Up to this point in his life, he's managed to skate around them because he was 'DA MAN.' But, it doesn't work that way in homicide cases. You can have your PHd here, IF you're lying, you get called on it! No 'grace period.'
No...........it's time to face 'karma.' You know what they say about that.
Next important date that we're aware of, Aug 11th isn't it? The clock is running.....:bang:
Just sayin'
IMHO
fran
PS....LOL, ok, here's the comparison to the Peterson case coming.....IF Brad is eventually arrested and tried for this crime......expect the beginning of the trial to be BORING according to the TH's as the pros has one after the other after the other, of people that WERE out jogging that morning and did NOT see Nancy. oi vey, I could here it now.
PPS.......Oh, one other thing
BRAD, LE does NOT like LIARS. Just thought you might like to know that point. Ehhhh........but I GUESS it's a little late for that to be of much use to you, huh? :woohoo: