Well, I guess we are even then.
You don't know either one.
I tend to believe sworn affidavits over gossip and speculation.
They were all sworn... lol
Well, I guess we are even then.
You don't know either one.
I tend to believe sworn affidavits over gossip and speculation.
OK I agree she said that...she also stated that she did not think Brad had anything to do with it... so how about that? You only pick and chose.
They were all sworn... lol
Your point was questioning what her friends said about Brad.
There were none by Nancy's family....all her close friends that Nancy confided in.
Brad's buds were his immediate family and a few guys he worked with at Cisco. They all said Brad was very private and to himself. Heck , he never even told his parents they were separating
Again, I chose to believe Nancy's friends as far as knowing the insides of the marriage.
So, JTF, did you get a chance to watch? Thoughts? Anyone? Anyone??
What are your accounts? Not only do you know nothing of who they REALLY were... you go by what her family and friends have said about him... so I will add some others that have said this about NC.
She has a 1200 dollar purse...
200 dollar jeans...
8000 dollar paintings....
200 pedicures.
BMW x5...
sure looks like showing off to me as well. Please to say because he had some web pages where he blogs or documents his accomplishments is NOTHING many others don't do.
[/quote]I didn't hear any revelations other than her saying Absolutely Not to any possiblity that Nancy may have been meeting up with someone.
She confirmed that Nancy and Carrie had no plans to run that day per her conversation with Carrie and that Nancy did confirm the night before she was going running the next morning.
She confirmed Nancy was the type that would show up.
Right because no one like NC would ever exaggerate her problems... beenthrough it first hand but what ever . again no hard feelings i'm out of here.
I think this showing off argument is baloney. All one has to do is look at the tax records to be able to tell that first - the BMW X 5 was not a new vehicle when it was purchased in 2006 by Brad. Neither was the BMW 325 as it was also a used vehicle. To me that seems to be a compromise position and definitely not showing off.
What is also intersting about those records is until 2006, there is only one vehicle in their possession. The man worked, he needed a car to get to work. Nancy had responsibility for children at home - she needed a vehicle to get those kids about. Funny she didn't get a vehicle for her and the kids to consistently use until 2006, two years after Bella was born.
Showing off - baloney.
I think this showing off argument is baloney. All one has to do is look at the tax records to be able to tell that first - the BMW X 5 was not a new vehicle when it was purchased in 2006 by Brad. Neither was the BMW 325 as it was also a used vehicle. To me that seems to be a compromise position and definitely not showing off.
What is also interesting about those records is until 2006, there is only one vehicle in their possession. The man worked, he needed a car to get to work. Nancy had responsibility for children at home - she needed a vehicle to get those kids about. Funny she didn't get a vehicle for her and the kids to consistently use until 2006, two years after Bella was born.
Showing off - baloney.
Let me add Brad had himself a motorcycle in 2002 as well - I have serious doubts that was purchased for Nancy.
He does say that the 325 had been Nancy's car prior to the purchase of the X5.
.
He does say that the 325 had been Nancy's car prior to the purchase of the X5.
I know that some of her friends' affidavits address her having to walk places and take taxis and that could be true in some instances if they shared a car. I know that when we had one car, I would drive my husband to work and pick him up. That way, I'd have a car to drive the kids places and run errands.
As this case progresses I think it would be interesting to keep a running tally of truths and lies as they are discovered/verified. Right now we have lots of 'he said/she said' stuff, but other than the affidavits, there's not much to work with.
Regardless of who had which car and when and who liked paintings or not and who had more friends or not, the things *I* am most interested in revolve around:
1. The visits to one (or more) HTs and the proof of each of those visits.
2. The exact times of those visits and exactly what was purchased when.
3. Results of the autopsy/COD/TOD
4. Forensic/DNA results (or lack thereof)
5. Any visits or calls by NC to Interact or similar facilities
6. The list of exactly what was confiscated from the SW on the house, office, computers, etc.
7. What, if anything, was found in or on either car on Sat/Sun from CPD searches.
8. What was laundered that Sat morning, requiring such an early visit to HT for detergent.
9. What plans were verified that Sat morning by NC, and what plans were verified that Sat morning by BC
Most of this will likely not be disclosed until after the arrest.
The rest will not be officially confirmed until trial.