I guess I am not seeing this. I knew SP was guilty from day one - it was his attitude and the way he presented himself in the media and everything he did (and didn't) do. I just don't see a single comparison (right now) to SP from BC except that BC's wife was murdered.
BC seems the geek (NERD) to me - typically introverted and "thinks funny" like every computer geek I have ever known. They are not social creatures, except with other geeks, they tend to run in small packs with their brethren. SP seemed to try to portray the roving "player" - had his "image" and his manly "stuff" happening. Brad drove a motorcycle to work for a while so Nancy could have the car and from what I have seen is so introverted he can barely look at people - he would NEVER approach a new woman - they would have to approach HIM - betcha Nancy made the 1st move in their relationship - she was a typical extrovert. Betcha Heather made the moves on Brad too. Brad does Ironman because it is so solitary - mostly men, no running in big "packs", no social aspect, plenty of time for introspection and it does require strategy, in short it's a loner's dream sport.
BC and Nancy were primary opposites. Nancy was the bold, outgoing, gregarious, extrovert - groups of people ENERGIZED Nancy and talking helped her think. Nancy craved constant contact with others, probably spent a lot of time on the phone talking about nothing - just chatting with one of her friends. Brad is quiet, introspective, a worrier and a complete introvert - groups of people tire him and make him anxious - he prefers to think out every word before he says it - he does not "chat" idly. He probably HATES to talk on the phone and when he does he's quick, concise and to the point. BC will have one or two friends he confides in and he probably was very direct and logical when he spoke to them about his troubled marriage. He just isn't a warm fuzzy guy and was probably happy (at least in the beginning) to play 2nd fiddle to Nancy in social situations.
And I disagree totally about Nancy being controlled - she was the least controlled woman I have ever seen portrayed as being abused or controlled by her husband. Controlling husbands do NOT let their wives and kids go off to Canada or the Beach with family or friends for weeks at a time alone. They sure don't allow them to attend parties alone till 2AM or run around all day without constantly calling and checking up on them. Nancy complained Brad DIDN'T keep in touch enough - hardly a controlling husband there, IMO. A controlling man would have been on the phone constantly while they were apart - even if HE was being unfaithful he would be compelled to make sure Nancy was staying in line while he was off straying himself. Nancy's OWN WORDS and those of her close friends say he wasn't doing that - the opposite (even avoiding going to be with the family at the beach for 2 weeks) in fact.
The only proof offered that BC was controlling was all about MONEY, nothing else. BC was openly trying to get Nancy to control her spending - on the advice of a financial advisor trying to assist them in getting out from under a growing mountain of high interest credit card debt. The 1st advice from such an expert is to cut up all credit cards, and have one person have the checkbook and ATM card and be "responsible" for paying the bills. And everything else you do with CASH - so you see what you are spending and on what. Read up on debt counseling advice, what they were doing is the 1st STEP and they BOTH would have agreed to the arrangement - at least at the time it began. That credit card debt gets SPLIT in a divorce, it could have hurt Nancy as bad as BC if they didn't get it paid down. It's smart, not about controlling Nancy (unless she was a spend-a-holic) but controlling THEIR MONEY and THEIR DEBT.
Look, it's highly probable that BC killed Nancy - probably during an argument about money - but it's not the only possible scenario. We have no idea WHEN Nancy died, (or where), whether she was sexually assaulted or had strange DNA on her body. We don't even know HOW Nancy died. All we know is where she was found, when she was found and who reportedly saw her last. That's ALL. And I'll believe statements made by her friends (who all seem to have been told a slightly different story by Nancy herself) as 100% factual when they are subject to corroboration and are made in deposition or in court where they stand up under cross examination. Affidavits (including BC's) mean NOTHING - they aren't worth the paper they are typed on. They aren't sworn statements of truth, just notarized statements of opinion - the only thing "sworn" is that the person said and personally believes what is contained in the document...nothing more. I can swear one out today that I saw Elvis in my swimming pool - all pretty and "legal" - but that doesn't mean I did, just that at that time I made the affidavit, I believed I did.
It would be nice if these cases could be resolved within a week - but they can't. There is no "perfect crime" and if BC killed Nancy he will be arrested and convicted because the evidence combined with the things uncovered in the investigation paint a clear portrait of her murder at BC's hands. I just am not seeing that "Picture" clearly yet --- as time and the evidence mount I am sure it will be clear to EVERYONE what happened to Nancy, who did it and why.
And if I die tomorrow, MY HUSBAND DID NOT KILL ME!
My Opinion
