Nancy Grace - 10/16/08 Thursday

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
This is some what OT, but I had to take my son to court today (driving on suspended license in dec of 07) when they called him up the judge and prosecutor asked him why he missed his first court date and my son said he couldnt get off work so then they said you couldnt have called so then he said he was between jobs, the point im getting at is i was so disgusted at his lies that i spoke up and i just told the judge the truth. I couldnt stand to hear the bs lies he was giving and he was making himself look so dumb and the courts werent buying any of it. but i just could not stand the lies and excuses he was giving just like casey is doing so i stopped him dead in his tracks.. by the way my son is 19 so this is a little OT but not totally.

Good for you! I bet your son will think about what you did today for a long time & learn from it. :blowkiss:
 
Scott Peterson was offered LWOP if he told where the body was. He turned it down. The bodies washed ashore and the rest is history. The "stone cold innocent" defense didn't work for him either. Neither did the homeless, the Satanists, the burglars, or the kidnapping for her jewelry.

LOL.....I missed the satanists part of that trial.....Did he really try to go there?

I doubt very much that KC will take any deal - I think she really believes that she's going to "beat" this...

But....I do believe LE would offer her LWOP in exchange for Caylee's remains



BOLDED BY ME
 
She didn't say "If I ever wanted to get rid of her," she said "If I just wanted to get rid of her." The meaning is completely different.

The first means "If I wanted to get rid of her at any time." The second could mean either, "If I merely wanted to get rid of her" or "If I only wanted to get rid of her."

Sounds to me like she was saying that getting rid of Caylee would not have been her motive or not have been her only motive. I think this is where the "spiteful" part of "spiteful b*tch" comes in.

Steadfast, I never noticed that. Even after all this time, reading that statement that way makes my stomach do flip-flops.
 
I know a lot of people think it's silly to even say this, but, how can we say for sure the nanny doesn't exist? Because they pulled one lady in and questioned her and it wasn't her?

And by the way, how do they ever hope to find Caylee if they always call everyone in advance and tell them when they're going to be coming over? But honestly, how much did they try to find the nanny? I hope the FBI have been on it.

Is it the Federal Bureau of Investigation by the way or was it the Florida Bureau? Are they still conducting an investigation? I haven't heard anything on that front in a long time

Seagull, why on earth would anyone need a nanny when they didn't have a job?
 
She didn't say "If I ever wanted to get rid of her," she said "If I just wanted to get rid of her." The meaning is completely different.

The first means "If I wanted to get rid of her at any time." The second could mean either, "If I merely wanted to get rid of her" or "If I only wanted to get rid of her."

Sounds to me like she was saying that getting rid of Caylee would not have been her motive or not have been her only motive. I think this is where the "spiteful" part of "spiteful b*tch" comes in.

:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek: Great catch!!
 
regarding the "fake kidnapping" theory involving chloroform, going along those same lines there's also the possibility of a failed suicide attempt, i.e. thinking chloroform would be a painless way to go to eternity along with her child. Or what if someone else used chloroform on the two of them and only KC survived. Or if KC was using it recreationally and Caylee got hold of it. Or that chloroform was in the trunk for other reason (drug manufacture, etc), there was a spill, child was riding in car seat in the back near the spill, etc. Or what if someone did attack KC with chloroform to get Caylee, she woke up and Caylee was gone.... etc
 
I know she stole from Amy after Caylee went missing, but she stole from her grandparents before that, and, unless I'm remembering incorrectly, she also stole from Cindy both before and after Caylee disappeared.

And she stole from JG while they were engaged . . .
 
I am sure more then just this ZG was looked into. She just happened to be the one that Casey had all the information on.

The investigators follow the evidence .... where it takes them is not up to the A's or anyone else.

FBI agent, Nick Savage testified at the GJ. He also escorted Casey to jail. So, to answer your question ... yes, FBI are still working on the case.

God bless OCSD and the FBI. I believe their investigation was thorough and their case is iron-clad (the GJ has spoken.) Justice will prevail for little Caylee.
 
Good for you. Tough love is the deepest love a parent can give.

Yes it is took me a while to learn this, but all in all he is a good kid doesnt drink or do drugs so i make it a point to tell him im very proud of him for that, but I tell him my only beef i have with him is he does not like to take blame for his own actions, its always someone elses fault. so needless to say we had a nice arguement on the way home but i just told him he has to learn and as long as he is under my roof i will not take him blaming me for his own actions...
 
regarding the "fake kidnapping" theory involving chloroform, going along those same lines there's also the possibility of a failed suicide attempt, i.e. thinking chloroform would be a painless way to go to eternity along with her child. Or what if someone else used chloroform on the two of them and only KC survived. Or if KC was using it recreationally and Caylee got hold of it. Or that chloroform was in the trunk for other reason (drug manufacture, etc), there was a spill, child was riding in car seat in the back near the spill, etc. Or what if someone did attack KC with chloroform to get Caylee, she woke up and Caylee was gone.... etc

Why in the world wouldn't Casey tell that if something like that happened?
 
Every single person interviewed said they knew she would never harm Caylee. She had a very normal, loving attachment to Caylee. That, coupled with the fact that she could leave her child with her parents anytime she wanted, is the reason I've never been able to buy that there was any motive to harm Caylee. Personally I think it's much more likely that an accident occurred, or that someone else harmed Caylee, or even that Caylee is out there alive still. I certainly pray she is.

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with this as being an accident. How many murders have we seen where friends/families say the same thing? It had to have been an accident, he/she would never do that.

I think she did it for several reasons:
1) CA was consulting with counselor and threatening to take Caylee away (this is rejection to KC and takes control away from KC)

2) also KC wanted her freedom

3) KC wanted attention/sympathy for LOSING a child

My point is, everytime we hear of a murder, it's always same song and dance from friends/family saying "the ______ I know would never do this. It had to be an accident.

Do we always KNOW people and what that person is capable of?
 
If MY child was kidnapped and LE said my car trunk contained decomposition, I WOULDN'T be defensive.

I'd be hysterical and worried.

The fact that Casey KNOWS the body couldn't be Caylee's IMO kinda makes Casey look guilty.

Casey dropped the car off June 27. How does she KNOW that body ISN'T Caylee's? Did Casey stand guard by the car trunk?

If somebody else kidnapped Caylee how would Casey have any idea where Caylee could have ended up???? (I think the Caylee is alive somewhere else is a bad defense. I have no doubt the state has compelling evidence provlng Caylee is gone.)

That is because you area a logical and rational person not an Anthony.
 
Rev. G. really annoys me. He never ever lets an opportunity go by without implying some blame against Cindy. What, he knew Casey about ten months. That's not long enough to really know anyone. She lied to his family and stole from his son during that time. Treated them worse than she did her "horrible" mother. If she'd had her way, his son's name would have been on the birth certificate and his cop paycheck would have been garnished for child support. He thinks it was an accident. What about Casey trying to get out of the debt and theft from her grandparents, from Cindy, from any future child support payments to Cindy, and be forever portrayed as a suffering searching mother of a missing child. I do agree that a kidnapping might have been planned though. A kidnapping with ransom of a child who is never found. The man has no clue about how she played him and seems to set herself up as a victim. I can't figure out why the media allows him to be speaking for this child. He's not her granddad and not even a relative or friend who knew Casey for years and years. He doesn't even seem to want true facts to come out or justice, only to blame Cindy for some weird reason.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
1,550
Total visitors
1,666

Forum statistics

Threads
606,258
Messages
18,201,146
Members
233,792
Latest member
Crainkd
Back
Top