No sightings of mom & pop in NO ?
Anywhere? Radio silence.......
Why are we talking about 'Nan' like she exists and isn't a figment of Casey's imagination? :scared:
I believe you are correct 2rose
Erica has been with the C and S Parsons since she was an infant but the adoption was finalized when she was approximately 2 years old.
which also causes me to wonder if there was any way that a set of foster parents could subtly interfere with anyone else deciding to adopt an infant or toddler in their care. Just some thoughts I am having on the whole CPS can determine if a child meets the criteria for special needs and the special assistance in the form of checks that child could then qualify for.
PURE SPECULATION on my part.
"I didn't talk to her face to face," Casey replied. "I talked to her like fifty times on the phone, um, right before she come up from New Orleans up here, I talked to her several, several times on the phone, lengthy conversations, where she even admitted she knew Strawberry, she knew Kelly, she has a letter admitting that she knows Nan, so and if she's the one who led Nan to me, so Carolyn has to know who this lady is. She might not know her by Nan because I think that's a fake name, but Carolyn knows who the lady is and there has to be something there."
So either Casey or LE has a letter stating that Carolyn knows Nan?? Is this supposed to be written before they gave Erica away or after it came to public attention that she was missing?
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/08/15/PARSONS_SEARCH_WARRANT_1 .PDF
Here's a typed list of inventory seized from the Parsons' home 08/14/2013
Page 1 of 3
2 - handwritten letters on yellow paper addressed to Casey and signed Carolyn Parsons
Casey says one of these lady's Knows Nan? and LE is not following up on that because............
Why are we talking about 'Nan' like she exists and isn't a figment of Casey's imagination? :scared:
Yes that is right ... I mentioned the 2 week mark ... below I bold an amended addition for you ...
ETA: I haven't actually researched the foster part ... but that was my understanding
... if someone knows of a correction, you are welcome to update.
ummmmm because people are allowed to have different opinions
& it is unamerican to try & squash the freedom of speech ?
I once saw a WS moderator's byline say that ...
if everybody is thinking alike,
then someone isn't thinking!
They were in Salisbury earlier in the week. At that point their lawyer pointed out that going to NO would be dumb (but he managed to finger-point at Carolyn some more).
So no one really knows where they are.
:facepalm:
I really do not know what to say other than I KNOW Erica was not handed off to someone named Nan who was her biological grandmother. I feel strongly that Erica was handed off to NO ONE. I believe she is no longer living.
That is where the evidence, mostly anecdotal in nature from CasP and her fictions and from relatives (multiple) who speak of abuse, leads me.
Nobody will be happier than I if Erica turns up somewhere alive and unharmed. But I think the odds of that are slim to none.
Sadly I have no proof, but happily this is a discussion forum where varied opinions are allowed and encouraged. We are not required to show PROOF of our theories or beliefs. They simply are opinions, everybody has one. Many will differ.
and that is A-okay.
Suspicious fire at home of missing teenager Erica Parsons who vanished two years ago may be arson, police say
Now in a new twist, investigators returned to the house on Miller Chapel Road, from which Mr and Mrs Parsons had recently been evicted, to carry out further tests.
What reason would there be for someone to take a 13 year old special needs girl while the adoptive parents kept the checks meant for the child?
I think what they are referring to is trafficking or sexual molestation of the girl.