I think, from the bits we've heard, that the prosecution has clearly shown overkill. But if MM does not take the stand, we've heard nothing about her involvement other than TM portaying her as an absolutely passive victim. I'm concerned that the jury finds him guilty but doubt with her. I hope not, as I believe she was very much a part of it, but I hope the prosecution comes back strong on rebuttal. #justiceforjason
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I agree. There appears to be distinct lack of focus on the paving stone, as if it is just a side issue, when instead blood spatter expert said it was used more than once. I have been waiting for the spotlight to go on MM but it appears it will not. Are her team thinking if they keep their heads down and lie low everyone will forget about her involvement, especially now that the expert says first blow may have been when Jason was in bed? I hope to God the closing arguments weave a coherent comprehensive alternative scenario together for the jury. It is easier for us as we have time to analyse here but the jury are getting a lot of information thrown at time with little time to digest it before the next wave comes.