Patchouliluvr
Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2013
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 21
Oh a good point them reading her journal, it shows just how nice Laura was. She did not write with hate and venom (so unlike what I prolly would have written ).
It seems to me that they're weighing the evidence for a first degree murder conviction.
Surprised nobody has asked if they can watch The Talented Mr. Ripley yet
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
Oh a good point them reading her journal, it shows just how nice Laura was. She did not write with hate and venom (so unlike what I prolly would have written ).
Gotcha. I do remember that now. Trying not to over analyze but darn it that 's hard.
In closing arguments, Boz pointed out that there's something fishy about the letter. He said that there's no way that Laura would suddenly give up the fight and accept $25k in exchange for Grant having sole custody of the children. He said that the letter relating to this was deliberately left at the apartment (everything else related to the alleged accident was thrown away) because it was supposed to be proof that Laura accepted the money and then she simply took off. That is, when Laura was reported missing and the last known place that she visited was Grant's apartment, Laura and Grant intended to produce the letter and claim that they didn't know anything about Laura's whereabouts.
The first half of the letter is written in Grant's handwriting. The last half of the letter is in a different handwriting, but there's doubt that it is Laura's handwriting. The suggestion is that the last half of the letter was forged by Amanda to appear like Laura's handwriting. Boz suggested that Laura was under duress when she signed the letter. If Grant and Amanda wrote the letter prior to the murder and then forced Laura to sign the letter, it is proof of premeditation and participation by Amanda in the murder.
I don't know who did the camera work on Arias but I really enjoyed the various shots of testimony and evidence being shown. I thought that person was quick. Sorry about the slowpoke crack. I am anxious that Amanda gets her just deserts ( I love Hot Fuzz), same as her hubby.
In closing arguments, Boz pointed out that there's something fishy about the letter. He said that there's no way that Laura would suddenly give up the fight and accept $25k in exchange for Grant having sole custody of the children. He said that the letter relating to this was deliberately left at the apartment (everything else related to the alleged accident was thrown away) because it was supposed to be proof that Laura accepted the money and then she simply took off. That is, when Laura was reported missing and the last known place that she visited was Grant's apartment, Laura and Grant intended to produce the letter and claim that they didn't know anything about Laura's whereabouts.
The first half of the letter is written in Grant's handwriting. The last half of the letter is in a different handwriting, but there's doubt that it is Laura's handwriting. The suggestion is that the last half of the letter was forged by Amanda to appear like Laura's handwriting. Boz suggested that Laura was under duress when she signed the letter. If Grant and Amanda wrote the letter prior to the murder and then forced Laura to sign the letter, it is proof of premeditation and participation by Amanda in the murder.
They didn't apparently need to weigh much evidencew to get to Grant's 1st degree murder conviction.
It was pretty easy for them (his jury).
Now suddenly for Mrs. Amanda it is suddenly harder....1st degree, accident, pre-planned?? We dont' know, confused, confused.
It sounds to me like they are unsure whether it was 1st degree or an accident.
Surprised nobody has asked if they can watch The Talented Mr. Ripley yet
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
IIRC the handwriting expert from FBI said 1st half of agreement was consistent w/GH's handwriting & last half was consistent w/LA's handwriting but she couldn't be sure about the date &'signature. I believe that if LA wrote the second paragraph, it was under duress. I agree that they were going to produce the document after LA's disappearance was reported, implying that she took the money & ran. In this scenario, it didn't matter that they didn't have the $25,000 because the note would indicate that they had already given her the money. They thought her body would never be found. Think this indicates premeditation.
They didn't apparently need to weigh much evidencew to get to Grant's 1st degree murder conviction.
It was pretty easy for them (his jury).
Now suddenly for Mrs. Amanda it is suddenly harder....1st degree, accident, pre-planned?? We dont' know, confused, confused.
It sounds to me like they are unsure whether it was 1st degree or an accident.
bbm
But I am having issue with why this jury is apparently taking a closer look than Grant's jury did. Why does Amanda get the benefit of "extra" attention/thoughtfulness?
She is as evil as Grant is. She did this just as much as he did.
JMO.
They didn't apparently need to weigh much evidencew to get to Grant's 1st degree murder conviction.
It was pretty easy for them (his jury).
Now suddenly for Mrs. Amanda it is suddenly harder....1st degree, accident, pre-planned?? We dont' know, confused, confused.
It sounds to me like they are unsure whether it was 1st degree or an accident.