Myvice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,483
- Reaction score
- 2,896
They would have still found out! They would have been investigated! They were pretty dumb and desperate! moo
I will definitely agree with that!!!
They would have still found out! They would have been investigated! They were pretty dumb and desperate! moo
If they hang on M1, then they go to M2, and then from there move down... I don't see how they could go below M2. But with Grant, there was no doubt left on the table. There was here (not for those of us that know and have been following along, but there was doubt left out there for the jury), so who knows. I didn't expect to hear a verdict before lunch but had hoped for something before 5pm... fingers crossed Laura gets more justice today.
You have to remember though that no one would have known they were broke if they didn't get caught. They could always say they gave her all the money they had to go away and now they're broke.
"Lucky Me" hubs n I r leaving for the casino for a short getaway. Can u come too? I need all the luck I can get LOL.
But don't you think that when things just didn't seem right - like LA not packing her apartment or saying goodbye to her co-worker or friends - it would all unravel? Then their finances would be front and center. I guess they never thought very far into their schemes to see how they might play out.
Unfortunately, I wasn't thinking about no testimony from neighbors hearing it. Now I'm worried!
But like others have said, it was during the day so maybe no one was home.
CRAAAAPPPPP!!:scared:
But they're charged with first deciding the M's. So if they can't decide on the M's, how can they proceed to the A's? I thought the only way to get to the A's was to find NG's on the M's.
:floorlaugh::lol: Peeps on Twitter debating whether they like the handwritten "Deliberating" sign better than the typed one! :lol:
When I heard the defense say no one heard the saw I had to wonder WHY DIDN'T THEY PUT SOME NEIGHBORS on the STAND to say WE WERE HOME and HEARD NOTHING? I thought the DEFENSE's job was to not JUST hope the prosecutors don't put enough on the table. They were charged with DEFENDING her. I immediately thought of that question - if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there does it make a sound!
Let's hope the jury is not THAT gullible!
But don't you think that when things just didn't seem right - like LA not packing her apartment or saying goodbye to her co-worker or friends - it would all unravel? Then their finances would be front and center. I guess they never thought very far into their schemes to see how they might play out.
Honestly, I don't think it makes a difference. I think they are overthinking things. Surely they must know a saw will make some noise. What difference does it make really? :waitasec: It's not like there was any testimony about how loud or quiet the saw was.
:dunno:
I must be the only one here not worried.
Maybe I should be!
I probably am so sure because of what I personally know that it doesn't occur to me that a jury sees and learns so much less. I think though, they have seen enough to put her away.
Hopefully she gets the same as Grant, because she is just as responsible for Laura being gone as he was, no matter how many of the "murder chores" she had on her list.
:
You are not only one not worried.
But don't you think that when things just didn't seem right - like LA not packing her apartment or saying goodbye to her co-worker or friends - it would all unravel? Then their finances would be front and center. I guess they never thought very far into their schemes to see how they might play out.
Yes I fully agree, it does not make a difference. Let's just hypothesize for a minute that Grant cut her up at some other location. Does that mean that Amanda's story is true. NO. A big, fat NO.
What about all of the other things Amanda did? What about taking her body all the way to Texas? What about sister Karen's house? What about the acid?
No way.
I think they are over-thinking it, too.