Steelslady
Justice for Kelsey
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,189
- Reaction score
- 62,717
Normally I would agree with your post, but I do think that the father did tell them all that he remembered in terms of the last place he saw his son and the direction he believed that Maddox headed. The father did mention that he brought Maddox to other parks in the past because he loved to run. Maddox would run ahead, turn around, and then laugh at his Dad and keep running when he thought his dad was getting close. It sounds like it was a fun game father and son played n several other occasions, to which ended in Maddox eventually either tiring out on his own or maybe he had had enough of the game and wanted to do something else with his Dad. This park was fenced in, perhaps the father didn't expect that Maddox would keep running and not stop nor did he expect Maddox to find a way out of the park on his own?Sure I guess anything is possible but consider this..... The child was not dropped off unattended in an empty isolated park, left to roam free. He was being pursued by his father and his "friend". The father claims a jogger witnessed the child running. He claims there were 3 people in front of him that witnessed the child, he claims some man on a bench spoke to him and asked if that was his child after he asked the child where his parents were but the child ignored him and kept running.
Given these "claims" any sensible person would have a very good general direction of the basic area the child would or could be. It's not like someone blindly dropped him from an air plane then landed and began a search from scratch. If the father chased him then he should have been able to pin point a general area to narrow the possibility of where the kid could possibly be. Knowing this, and being familiar with the park.... I just don't see how he could end up in that Creek unnoticed from day 1 much less days later. There are obstacles that would hinder a 6yr old and at least slow him down enough to be able to be found.