I feel like BB is getting a lot of benefit of the doubt where it lacks for AT here.
I don't think she was groomed, (though I'm sure this would be an option for her defense when it comes to it) or lured in, or even necessarily manipulated. Yes the age gap is strange, but IMO it is equally likely that BB is the one who has done the manipulating - calling him "babe" could be an example of this.
I have seen many examples in everyday life of young, attractive twenty-somethings using their lure to seduce older, unattractive "partners" for some gain, be it money, a free ride, a fancy home, or as could be the case here, drugs, somewhere to stay, possibly access to his schemes (there is talk on facebook of antique thefts and the like) or whatever.
To clarify I in no way believe AT to be deserving of benefit of the doubt, I'm just confused as to why BB is getting it.
I don't see any signs of her being held against her will, uncomfortable, unsure, anything. I have watched the video many times, looked at the casino pics and looked at their profile pic.
She looks just as much "in" this as he does to me.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk