GUILTY Netherlands - Jos Brech, 55, wanted for murder, Vosges (Fr) winter 2018

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Mireia woont in Spaans huis waar Jos B. verbleef: 'Hij zei dat hij alle tijd had om te reizen'

Mireia has been living with her friend and daughter in La Encantada for almost fifteen years. That is the house where in recent months also Jos B. was staying. He is suspected of involvement in the death of Nicky Verstappen in 1998. "He suddenly appeared on our doorstep."

According to various media, the house is a commune, but that is not true according to Mireia. "It's not a commune, it's an ordinary home where volunteers regularly stay and where we organize courses," she tells RTL News.

Mireia, who does not want to be named with her surname, makes natural cosmetics from plants. That was also her connection with Jos B.

"Jos B. appeared one day in May on the doorstep of the house, with a map of the area in his hand," says Mireia. "He had read about the place and asked me if he could stay here in exchange for work."

Jos B. knew a lot about wild plants, especially about medicinal use. "That's where our connection lay. He hardly spoke Spanish and I did not speak much English, and much of our communication was through books on plants.

They went out together a lot in the woods, to collect medicinal plants. "He showed me plants that can lower fever, for example. Jos B. did not make any medications or cosmetics, he only picked all the ingredients. "In addition, he did all kinds of other jobs. Cooking, cleaning, maintenance of the house."

Mireia talked with him about his life in the Netherlands. "He told us about the scouts that he had lived with his mother for a while, that she had died and that he therefore had all the time to travel. She describes him as a normal man. He was reserved and treated children well. "He behaved absolutely not suspiciously with them."

The family had no suspicion that anything was wrong until they heard from the police and a Dutchman who had lived in the house for a long time that the police were looking for him. "This hits us like thunder in clear skies. A total shock. Jos is a man you wouldn' t expect to have such a terrible past."

"From now on we will be more cautious about hiring volunteers, we will be screening them better. Most volunteers come to us through an organisation, and not just walk in like Jos.

The family feels sorry for the parents of Nicky Verstappen. "We would like to let them know that we sympathise with them and send them lots of love."


BBM
 
Deskundige uit Haarlem: ’Zet Jos B. niet in klein kamertje’

Judicial psychologist Peter van Koppen from Haarlem participated personally in the Nicky Verstappen investigation. Still, he is one of the greatest critics after the resounding DNA breakthrough. "Let them first properly interrogate suspect Jos B."

"Whatever you do, don't put him in a small room," Van Koppen offers unsolicited advice.

At the request of the investigative team, the 65-year-old professor at the Vrije Universiteit made an analysis of the movements of the murderer of eleven-year-old Nicky Verstappen at the beginning of 2016.

"How did the perpetrator enter and leave the area, how did he get to the children's camp, how did he dump the corpse? Based on how people behave, how far people travel for a crime, a geographical picture emerged. Give me a series of crimes committed by the same offender and I can provide very reasonable information about where he lives."


After twenty years of police investigation, the eagerness to make the suspect Jos B. (55), who was arrested in Spain this week, confess may well be a pitfall. In Van Koppen's view, alluding to prison life, where paedophiles and rapists have an above-average difficulty, is as unwise as interrogating in a classic small room. "If they put pressure on him, the detective will become his enemy. What is at stake is building trust. To be straightforward. Make it clear to him: 'we want to know how your DNA ended up there'."

And then we have to wait and see how it will work out. Van Koppen: "If it goes the same way as with Jasper S. of course you're in a good position. He told a whole story (about how he raped and murdered Marianne Vaatstra *, ed.). If B. denies everything, then it will be a very hard struggle."

According to Van Koppen, denial or remaining silent is a real option for the suspect. Or B. comes up with a completely different explanation for the discovery of his DNA at the crime scene. Van Koppen: "He might say he met the boy and that he asked for help."

According to this expert, DNA matching alone is not enough for a conviction. The fact that cases are solved more or less automatically with DNA is a widespread misunderstanding. Van Koppen: "A guest lecturer even claimed that witness statements were no longer necessary!"

Nothing could be further from the truth, says the legal psychologist. To clarify this, he comes up with an example that he uses often: "When I kill my wife in my own home the discovery of my DNA says nothing at all. Per definition, my wife is covered with my DNA." Nothing beats the complete story that only witnesses can tell - it is the favourite subject of the man from Haarlem.

There is another problem before the Nicky Verstappen case can be brought to a successful conclusion. According to Van Koppen, Jos B.'s DNA material was not lawfully obtained. DNA in these kinds of cases may only be obtained voluntarily. You can't take any other route. According to him, the Public Prosecution Service is trying to conceal this.

The Public Prosecutor in Limburg does not want to respond to criticism from Van Koppen, a spokeswoman says. The importance of the investigation is now paramount. Since the arrest of the accused, we have entered a new phase and we are not adding anything to what we have been saying so far.

Van Koppen has a lunch appointment with the public prosecutor in the Nicky Verstappen case. During dessert, he will probably focus on what I said, the legal psychologist thinks. Laughing: "For the time being, it's not going to happen. He is currently in Spain."

BBM


The opinion of the learned professor about the DNA that would not have been lawfully obtained, is not widely supported.

* Marianne Vaatstra (1982 - 1999) was found murdered in a field in May 1999. In 2012 her murder was solved through a DNA kinship investigation, conducted within a 5 km radius of the crime site, among over 8000 men who lived there in 1999. This voluntary investigation focused on men with a Y chromosomal DNA profile similar to that of the perpetrator, in order to find the him through family trees of matching persons. This was the first investigation of its kind in the Netherlands.
 
The mysterious death of Nicky Verstappen


After the capture of child molester Jos Brech (55) from Simpelveld the family of Nicky Verstappen can finally breathe a sigh of relief. There are still a lot of questions to be answered. After all, how did the then 11-year-old Nicky end up dead in 1998? And what kind of man is that lonely bushcrafter?



On Monday 10 August 1998 the sun rises at 6.15 a.m. The wind is weak in the southeast. In South Limburg the temperature has dropped to 13 degrees at night, during the day it will become slightly cloudy and over 30 degrees. On the De Heikop campsite in Brunssum, five boys went to sleep in one tent on Sunday evening: Mark Hermanns (12), another boy named Mark (11), Kay (10), Ian (9) and Nicky Verstappen (11). They arrived on Saturday morning with 37 boys under the age of twelve by bus from Heibloem, for a holiday camp named after its founder: retired former teacher Joos Barten. Heibloem is located fifty kilometers north. Nicky was there for the second time: in 1997 he suffered from homesickness and had skipped one camp. The camp started for him in 1998 with a disappointment: at the very last moment his best boyfriend turned out not to be going. And on Sunday night he had had a quarrel with Ian about a packet of chewing gum that had disappeared, but that had all been settled.

The boys' tent stands right next to the fence that borders the Brunssummerheide and right next to the tent where the camp leaders are having a great time until late into the night. Only camp leader Barten has his own tent. At ten o'clock on Sunday evening, camp leader Sjra walks the last round: now to sleep, boys! It doesn't get very quiet: Mark Hermanns has burned his fingers on a lamp earlier that day, around twelve o'clock Sjra and Barten bring him the ointment for burns.

Monday morning at a quarter past five Ian gets up to pee. The toilet block is quite a distance away. It is not uncommon for the boys to pee some distance from the tent against a tree. Where? Behind the tent is a hole in the fence. It's easy to get through.

At that moment Nicky is still in the tent. It's starting to get a little light. Barten is also up early: at ten to six he goes to see if everything is quiet at the tent of these boys, but he doesn't look inside. Otherwise he might have seen that Nicky had disappeared. Barten then visits the bathroom and clears things up in the dining tent for breakfast. At seven o'clock he wakes up camp leader Jack and then continues cleaning. He leaves at eight o'clock. Bars has to go to a funeral in Heibloem.

In the boys' tent Mark Hermanns wakes up at six o'clock. He does not know why. He sees that Nicky is gone; he thinks Nicky must have gone for a moment to the toilet. At ten to eight, camp leader Sjra wakes up everyone for breakfast. At eight o'clock the boys tell that Nicky is gone.

At half past eight camp leader Pieter calls Nicky's parents: Peetje and Berthie Verstappen. They do not hear the telephone. At nine o'clock Pieter calls again. He gets Nicky's sister Femke (7) on the line and tells him Nicky has walked away. At half past eight, camp leader Jack calls the police station to report that a child has gone missing.

The parents immediately know that this is bad news. Nicky is no runaway. He is not a hero or an enterprising boy who would leave voluntarily. Peetje gets in the car immediately and drives as fast as he can to Brunssum. His anxiety is certainly not diminished when camp leader Pieter says that Nicky had been away for six hours. Barefoot: his shoes are still in the tent. A little later he runs into Mark, a good acquaintance of the family Verstappen. Mark says that 'they' took Nicky with them, but he didn't see anything or anybody.

Around half past eight, two chief police officers reported to Brunssum. Camp leader Jack tells them that Nicky probably got away at around half past six.

The officers don't bother to speak to father Peetje, although they do see him. The agents leave and go to the area to check if anyone has seen the runaway. At half past three in the afternoon, Jack reports the disappearance to the police station, to the astonishment of police officers on duty: why do the parents not do this? Jack prefers to avoid publicity. If the media have to be informed, camera crews will not be allowed in order not to worry the other children unnecessarily. That afternoon a search is carried out in the area: with a megaphone the name of Nicky is shouted.

The next day, Tuesday 11 August, two detectives come to De Heikop. When they speak Peetje, he says he's sure Nicky hasn't disappeared voluntarily. A large alarm is raised immediately. It takes until four o'clock in the afternoon before the search team is complete: a platoon of the Mobile Unit, the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee, personnel from a nearby military base, volunteers from the fire brigade and citizens from Heibloem. Uncle Wim and cousin Peter also search, the police does not allow Nicky's father to join.

At a quarter past eight in the evening, the last search team sets off. At nine o'clock they walk through a corn field and come to the wire trimming of a narrow, elongated forest of young Christmas trees. Nephew Peter sees something reddish and shouts:

" There is something there!" A military constabulary climbs over the fence and sees Nicky's body, between the trees, about four metres behind the fence. He has turned bluish. He only wears underpants and the long red pyjama pants of his favorite football club: Ajax.

Then the police investigation starts: a succession of blunders and misunderstandings. There is no clear leadership: the team leader and the public prosecutor are unable to work together. As a result, the technical examination at De Heikop does not start until four o'clock the following day. There's nothing left there anymore: the camp leadership broke off the camp and returned everything by truck to Heibloem. A swimming suit and sports suit from Nicky have disappeared without trace and will never be found again. Only the tent where Nicky was lying is left behind.

The autopsy report states that the cause of death cannot be established. Possible suffocation. There are no visible signs of violence or sexual abuse, but the suspicion is there. The pyjama pants are inside out, the blue underpants inside out and backwards.

For many crimes, Ockham's law applies: "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem." Translated: you don't have to bring in more than you need. In other words, the simplest explanation is the best. This certainly applies to the case of Nicky Verstappen. Over the years, numerous theories have been circulating.

In the week before Nicky was there, there was also a camp, with the same camp master Joos Barten. Then there was an incident with a fifteen year old girl, also from Heibloem. She suffered from hyperventilation and at one point was left alone in the tent. Barten had given her one of his own sleeping pills, temazepam, which is not suitable for children. When she woke up, she noticed that her clothes had been ruffled. She had an unpleasant feeling and only told her mother about it after the camp week. She was afraid that she had been sexually abused.


BBM


More to follow.
 
The mysterious death of Nicky Verstappen, continued

The suspicion is directed particularly at Barten, and that is not surprising. On 14 August, he informed the police of a 'serious fact' from his past. "In 1954 I touched some boys on their thighs and their sex (penis). On 31 December 1954, I was dismissed as head of the primary school in Heibloem."

He was sentenced to three months in prison, and everyone in Heibloem knows the story. He realises that this will inevitably remembered. He does deny any involvement in Nicky's death; the police accept his story and he is not considered a suspect. An expensive mistake: Barten dies in 2003, at the age of 85. In 2010, suspicions about his involvement were running high and his remains were excavated for DNA testing. There was no match.

In the years that follow the media have been repeating that Nicky's death must have been an inside job. This assumption tears the village of Heibloem apart, into two camps. There are more camp leaders with a moral spot in their past. Camp leaders and their relatives feel attacked by the family of Nicky. From then on, the holiday camp will no longer be named after its founder, Barten. The parents move away from Heibloem.

After the match with Jos Brech, voices are calling for the rehabilitation of Barten, to the indignation of Nicky's parents. The in memoriam card at his death on September 8, 2003 mentions his royal decoration, but his life's work for the holiday camp is not mentioned. Stunning detail: despite his conviction in the 1950s, no authority objected when he took in foster daughters. According to the picture on the card, he looks down at them from the sky with a smile.

In addition to Ockham's law, there is another well-known principle in crime: that an offender returns to the scene of the crime. It will take 20 years for this to come to light in the Nicky case.

Back to the evening when his body is found. The area is closed off.

At half past one at night a man passes by. He is stopped by two military police officers. When they ask him what he is doing, he says he was getting warm and started cycling for a while. Quite a while. He lives in the Haembuckersstraat in Simpelveld, almost twenty kilometres away. The military constabulary notes his data, but it will still take many years before the name of this 'passer-by' will be retrieved from the file as someone who is eligible for a DNA test. It is not known how many of these passers-by were in the vicinity in the hours following the discovery. Although DNA traces found on Nicky's clothing were secured, they had not initially led to a match: the DNA technique is not yet as advanced. What should have happened in any case is that the name of this man - Jos Brech - should have been included in the file with a red mark. That is not happening. Even more painful, in retrospect: if someone had started to take a serious look at this person, they would have encountered an incident from 1985. On 8 July that year it appeared on the front page of the Limburg daily newspaper: "A man from Simpelveld told the National Police that he had committed sexual abuse with children. At the time with two 10-year-old boys in the Wijnandsraderbos in Nuth, a year earlier with two boys in Wijlre. " After an official report had been drafted about him, he was released.

During a new investigation in 2001, Brech was heard as a witness. Why had he been there by bike at night? He says he had delivered letters for the scouting because it was too hot during the day. The police will check that. In scouting, they describe Brech as 'a weirdo', but they confirm that he had the habit of delivering letters himself in order to save stamps. He goes on to say that he was interrogated about a sex crime with children in 1985 and that he then went into treatment with the Riagg. The police do not quite trust it and interrogate him a second time. What else did he do in the two days when Nicky was missing? He can't remember that: he thinks he was at home. The interrogation is not very thorough. Whether he had also delivered mail to De Heikop on the night of Nicky's disappearance or when he was stopped as a passer-by two days later, is not asked and not checked.

In 2002, a member of the police team alerts his former colleague Frank Peters. Like Brech, Peters is active in scouting in Heerlen. The warning: "Jos Brech is a man you do not want to have around scouts." He does not give any details. When Peters confronts Brech with this, Brech confesses that he is attracted to boys and that he has committed a sexual offence in the past. During a bike ride he had met two boys, whom he had photographed. He had 'gone too far'. Brech says he is attracted to boys between 10 and 14 years old. Peters asked him to cancel his membership. He does, but still there is no one who connects him with Nicky Verstappen. Nor did the victims of the time - or their parents -.

It was not until 2008 that DNA technology had advanced enough for a proper match, suitable for large-scale investigation. In hindsight, the most blameworthy error was that Brech was not selected as one of the 144 people invited for this investigation. He still appears in the file only as a passer-by. It will take almost another ten years before he emerges as part of the costly DNA relationship investigation.

In November 2017, 1500 men will first be selected for an 'ordinary' DNA test. This time Brech is part of the selection.
He still lives with his mother in Simpelveld, but twice the police do not find him at home and leave a letter behind. He tells his family that he is going to take part in the investigation, but he doesn't come forward. Instead he has registered with his sister in Veendam. It was later said that he had already gone abroad in October 2017. In February of this year, he was officially reported missing. Brech is active in bushcraft: survival in the wilderness. He has joined a club that has a mountain cabin in the Vosges, in France. Searches made by club friends do not yield any results.

After the arrest in 1985, Brech has been in therapy with Riagg for two years. After that he was active in a playgroup, youth work and scouting clubs. Presumably always on benefits, as a volunteer. There are no indications that he has abused children during this period.

After the match at the beginning of June, the police first try to track him down in France, near the mountain refuge in the Vosges. This is not successful, and a press conference is held on 22 August at which the details of the match, his name and his photograph are released.

Noteworthy: while the police and judicial authorities were unable to find out anything about the arrest in 1985, someone from the Limburg Regional Historical Centre sends the official registration with the court to 'Nieuwsuur' television, with details of the infringement of Article 247 of the Penal Code committed in Nuth on 5 July 1985, about abduction with minors. It states that he was taken into custody on 5 July, despatched on 7 July. The case was suspended conditionally, with a probationary period of two years ending on 27 November 1987. This document makes no mention of the sexual abuse of the previous year, in August 1984 in Wijlre.

What was Jos Brech doing at De Heibloem during the night of August 10th and how did he meet Nicky? The most logical explanation is that Nicky had to pee at night and walked out of the tent. To the toilet block, or to a tree nearby. And that Brech was there in the early hours of the morning. For how long?

We may never know.

If he wants to make a statement, he can say what he wants, there is almost nothing that can be checked. He can say that he saw Nicky walking by by chance, that he spoke to him for a while, that nothing special happened and that Nicky still lived when he left.


The place where Nicky was found is about eight hundred metres from the tent camp. Most logical scenario: Brech has seen Nicky outside the tent, overpowered him and without anyone having heard or seen anything, carried him away for a short distance. At some distance there has been sexual abuse, with Nicky's clothes pulled off. Nicky died before, during or after that. Possibly by suffocation, to prevent him from making a noise. Brech then put the clothes back on and took him to the spot between the pine trees. After the police investigation, local residents believe they see a drag trail in the corn field, but this is not included in the file.

In those days, the Brunssummerheide at the Heikop is a well-known meeting place for gays. It is by no means excluded that Jos is therefore familiar with this location, but it can also be a coincidence.

Joseph Thereasia Johannes ('Jos') Brech was born on October 29, 1962 in Venlo. His father Johannes Maria ('Johan') was born in Eindhoven in 1930; the family of his mother's side comes from the area around Breda. From Eindhoven they moved to Venlo, later to Simpelveld. They live there at least in 1970. On 3 October of that year, horticulturist Johan Brech held de Boerenleenbank liable for the damage - NLG 1,200 - caused by a hole dug behind the bank. On his land. The contractor and the bank have a good laugh: Brech has rented the land and knows for a long time that he will have to give it up. The plant trade is not doing well: in July 1971 he was declared bankrupt. Bankruptcy was terminated in January 1972.

In Simpelveld, the family never seems to have been integrated into the community. Primary school classmates remember Jos as a loner. The family has no contact with their neighbours and no one knows anything about other social contacts. In the street they don't greet and there are no children coming to their house to play. In August 1973, the Limburg newspaper published a report about a match at a gymnastics championship in Haren, Germany. The RK Turn and Acrobat Club Simpelveld (RKTAC) took part. Jos ranks second in the triple rally in the group of 10 to 12 years old.

After primary school Jos goes to the primary technical school in Nijswiller.

On 25 June 1980, the new youth group in Simpelveld announces that a search with a campfire would be held. One can register with J. Brech. On 6 December 1983, the Limburg daily newspaper reported that there were plans to breathe new life into the youth work. "Young people between 11 and 16 years old who want to participate in this project can contact Jos Brech, Haembuckersstraat 13." This is the address in Simpelveld where the police will arrive in November 2017. In all those years hasn't anyone made a link between Jos and the death of Nicky Verstappen?

His father, in any case, did not: he died in 1981. His mother died on March 25, 2018. Didn't anyone in the family suspect this dark secret? When Jos was already on the radar of the police, DNA had to be taken from family members. The most direct line: his two sisters. Both, according to De Limburger, have refused to cooperate. By means of a genealogical investigation, two family members from the fourth or fifth degree were approached who did participate. Without their help, the 100% match with Jos Brech would never have been made - and the bushcrafter would never have been caught so quickly.

For the reconstruction, data from the book The mysterious death of Nicky Verstappen by Simon Vuyk was used.
The article was written by HJ Korterink, crime repeorter.


BBM
 
Jos Brech: lonely and misunderstood, never angry

Crime reporter HJ Korterink has published statements from persons who know Jos Brech on his website.

Yesterday there was a reaction from someone who showed another side of Jos Brech ("A gentle, damaged man"). This is a side that many readers do not want to hear: they would prefer to hang him from the highest tree without any form of process. For those who are interested in some nuance, now the sequel.


I knew Jos a long time ago. Long before 1998, but after 1985. I worked with him on children's holiday camp in two places in South Limburg. What I have seen is a quiet man who has always kept a distance, both to adults and to children. I have never seen him give a hug, at most a fleeting touch. He immediately recognised damaged children and studied their background in order to better understand them. He tried to give them a couple of carefree, enjoyable days.

I recognized his distant attitude like my own. I, too, was a lonely, misunderstood child with an aggressive father. The most obvious symptom of this is a deep-rooted distrust, because if you cannot trust even your "safe" carers as a child, who can you trust? And just like with my family, everything was covered up. And if you have to keep such a big secret, you become even more suspicious and distant. The whole B. family guarded that secret as if their lives depended on it. What I am sure of is that the deceased father used violence, the rest I can only derive / speculate on the basis of the behaviour of the next of kin. I do not rule out abuse.

So I can certainly explain why Jos never sought to deepen his contact with others. Probably he feels more comfortable with children because children do not ask questions or judge him. That contact is much more open and therefore safer. The fact that he has stated that he feels attracted to young boys does not surprise me. Personally, I estimate that he has been struggling with this since his adolescence. My assessment is that he was/is well aware that this preference was wrong. He probably crossed borders a few times in weak moments, losing control of his self-restraint. Apparently he was caught in 1985. He has cooperated neatly in his treatment at the time, according to the reports of those involved at the time.

Nor do I know him as someone who resists or obstructs. Joining in or withdrawing is more his way. I have never seen any spark of anger or aggression in him. Jos was/is an observer, that way he can maintain a distance that is safe for him and it places himself outside of possibly complicated social situations. Hiding himself/not wanting to be seen is his second nature. His survival strategy, that grew from his unsafe childhood. This also brings me to his flight from the DNA investigation. I know him only as a traveller with a low budget and the smallest possible footprint, he has never been different, already many years before 1998.

I do not, of course, know whether he has realised that he had left a trail. For me, there is also the possibility that he just didn't want to give up DNA because of his deep-rooted distrust. And even if he knew there might be a trace of him, I think he never expected such a manhunt. The fact that members of the community where he was staying told that he was completely uninterested in the Internet or the outside world is explained as going into deep hiding. Isn't there also a possibility that he knew he was evading the DNA investigation, but had no idea about the media explosion and the intensive search?

For me, this is also fits the naive story told to the military constabulary at the crime scene. And even if he knew there could be a trace of him, I think he never expected such a manhunt. The fact that members of the community where he was told that he was completely uninterested in the Internet or the outside world is explained as going into hiding. Isn't there also a possibility that he knew he was evading research after the event, but had no idea about the media explosion and the intensive search?

For me, this is also in keeping with the naive story against the military constabulary at the crime scene. A real psychopath and cunning murderer would have said that he had forgotten his id at home and given a false name. Then he would have completely disappeared from any radar. But no, he gives his real name and also tells us that he was once convicted for sexual abuse with minors. Do such stupid psychopaths exist? The police officer who arrested him in Spain described his surprise at the arrest and also that he did not resist in any way. This is explained in the media in the most negative way. And all eyewitnesses add a negative fact that is widely milked out, while 95% of the statements describe a silent distant man who behaves decently.

Exactly as I know him.

I cannot look anyone in the head and make any statements about his possible involvement in what happened to Nicky. What I do know is that the image that is now being sketched of him does not fit the Jos I know. I know him as particularly gentle and his family too. I can imagine a scenario in which he does not have his impulses under control and then everything goes wrong, but I find it difficult to portray the image of a mad rapist and murderer. The only thing that is known to the public is that a contact trace has been found and that Jos has therefore touched Nicky's clothing. The rest is guesswork.

I sincerely hope, therefore, that Jos will have a friendly and patient interrogator in front of him who will create a situation in which he can honestly tell his story, no matter what that may be. That his lawyer supports him in this. That he will be tried fairly. And that he can still have a life after all this. I am afraid, however, that the media and mass hysteria are influencing everything in such a way that Jos and his family will never be able to live a pleasant life again, within Europe. Whether or not he is guilty or innocent of the charges against him.


Thus the statement. Most of the reactions from people who know Jos are quite similar to this. It is always the case that when someone you know is arrested for a serious crime, there is amazement and incomprehension. Everyone mentions the absence of aggression. That makes one even more curious about Jos's story about what happened. It also fits in with what we already know: that Nicky did not die as a result of violence.

Giving his name and address to the military constabulary is another huge brainteaser. If Jos was involved in Nicky's death almost two days earlier, as everyone assumes, it is strange that he has provided the real data.
He must have realised that this was an enormous risk. At that time, you were not obliged to have an id with you. Incredibly naive, or overwhelmed? But how surprised can you be if, two days earlier, you were involved in the death of a boy in that place?
All the same, the chance that someone other than Jos will be responsible for Nicky's death is very small.



BBM
 
Having read the articles translated by ZaZara, my heart sank somewhat.
I was really excited when I read that JB had been caught, in my typically naive way I thought that now he will come clean and tell LE what happened the day Nicky died.
But when you have a closer look at his personality and behaviour this seems to be wishful thinking :( He has always been a loner, from his childhood on. From my own experience I know that loners don't really need anybody, no socializing, no relationships.
I really hope that he'll get the "right " kind of interrogators who can make him talk.
Just wanted to add: this Barten guy gives me the creeps!:confused:
 
From a newspaper clipping from July 4, 2001, some critical details emerge whith new and stil unanswered questions

Stop op onderzoek naar dood Nicky Verstappen

Parents and Peter R. de Vries continue, police investigation into death of Nicky Verstappen is halted.



MAASTRICHT - The Limburg South District Police have suspended the investigation into Nicky Verstappen's death for the time being. The police announced this yesterday. According to the police, it will never become clear how the boy died. Nor is it certain whether he has been sexually abused.

The 11-year-old Nicky Verstappen from Heibloem in Northern Limburg disappeared on 8 August 1998 during a youth camp on the Brunssumerheide. Two days later he was found lifeless near the camp. A team of medical scientists looked into the cause of death, but could not agree.

In total, the Limburg-South police spent 48,000 hours on the file, the largest police investigation ever in the district. In August 1999 the police also stopped the investigation. They reopened it at the request of the parents in November last year, following a TV broadcast by crime reporter Peter R. de Vries.

In the course of the investigation, 375 people were interviewed and three house searches carried out. Last week the police arrested a man from Kerkrade who was released after three days for lack of evidence. The man was near the youth camp in 1998 and is known to the police for sex crimes. He is no longer regarded as a suspect.

Nicky's mother, Bertha Verstappen, reacts disappointed but not broken. "We need to recover now, but we will not rest until we know who killed Nicky."

Nicky's parents are critical of the police investigation. They continue to be surprised that the man who organises the children's camps in Heibloem was never a suspect in the case. "He was questioned, and so was, but never by a specialist. And we think that is necessary, because he would have a split personality", says Mrs. Verstappen.

Moreover, according to her, various reports of sexual abuse have been made against the youth leader in the past.

"We do not understand why someone with such a past has not been arrested as a suspect.

The Verstappen family will have to live with an unclear cause of death. Medical scientists have failed to reach a uniform verdict on the way in which Nicky has died. "But that he was killed is a fact of life for us. Nicky was a cautious child, who would never have roamed the moor on his own."

Crime reporter Peter R. de Vries, who has been involved in the case from the outset, is also surprised by the fact that the camp leader received relatively little attention in the police investigation. According to De Vries, almost the entire camp leadership could boast of a dubious (moral) past. The journalist pledges to remain focused on the Nicky case until it is resolved.

He considers it "extremely regrettable" that the investigation has been stopped. De Vries is of the opinion that the police made "serious mistakes" in the initial phase, that they did not deploy sufficient resources and that they did not make use of the possibilities for investigation. The journalist is surprised that it was only recently that it became clear that Nicky, after his disappearance, lived considerably longer than previously thought. According to De Vries, this could have been established at the time. According to the reporter, important potential testimonies have been lost due to the lack of such a finding.

In 1999, De Vries breathed new life into the stagnant police investigation by broadcasting his television programme. He also found a few businessmen prepared to put half a million guilders on the table as a reward for the golden tip.

BBM


"Total bafflement is caused by a new investigation into the time of death. After entomological examination (insect technology), that time may have to be drastically adjusted. A specialist calculates from photographs with maggots that Nicky died at two o'clock on Monday at the earliest and possibly between nine and ten o'clock on Tuesday morning. The news hits like a bomb. Nicky may have lived a full day longer and was possibly still alive during the search."

Source: De moord op Nicky Verstappen

BBM


If Nicky lived a full day in captivity (?), where and how would he have been? Jos Brech was still living with his mother, he would not have taken him home.

It isn't clear how Nicky died, where Nicky died and when Nicky died. Nor if he was sexually abused, though everything points to it.

Three sets of DNA from different men have been found on his body. The trace of DNA that belongs to Jos Brech is the trace of the perpetrator, according to LE.
The other two traces have not yet been identiefied, the DNA investigation continues.
 
Last edited:
Tipgever die speurders naar voortvluchtige Jos Brech leidde: “Hij had geen idee van wat hem overkwam”

"Jos Brech had no idea what was happening"

The Dutchman who last week gave the golden tip that led to the arrest of Jos Brech, the suspect in the murder of Nicky Verstappen (11) in 1998, was interrogated on Saturday for hours by the Spanish police. De Telegraaf reports this. "Brech wasn't at all aware that he was being sought. He hadn't been on the internet for a long time, he didn't want to".

The 46-year-old Erik (a false name, because he wants to remain anonymous) was interrogated for hours on Saturday by the Spanish national police in the presence of Dutch investigators and a prosecutor. They wanted his official statement before Brech was extradited to the Netherlands, which is planned for next week.

Erik testifies to De Telegraaf that the detectives were " rather happy " that he had only tipped them the Sunday before and not the night before. In that case, the police would have needed to capture Brech in the dark. "And that had entailed risk, and danger," said the man who reported the golden clue. "The police officers clearly showed that they were very satisfied that the operation could be carried out in daylight the following day. Otherwise Brech could have fled much more easily. And then that would have been their fault, they told me."

According to Erik, Jos Brech had "no idea what happened to him" when the detectives arrested him. "He wasn't at all aware that he was being sought internationally, that his name and photograph had been distributed.... Brech hadn't been on the internet for a long time, he didn't want to. He never even asked for the wifi's password in the community house where he was hiding. He never went online and wasn't aware of anything."

If Brech is extradited to the Netherlands next week, he will immediately be detained again. He is then questioned by the examining magistrate and he will have to answer questions from the investigators. The murder suspect will be detained in a 'cell in restriction', which means that he may only have contact with his lawyer.


BBM
 
Suspect in Nicky Verstappen case back in the Netherlands on Wednesday

Jos Brech will travel to the Netherlands on Wednesday. The suspect in the Nicky Verstappen case will be taken from Spain by special plane, the Spanish public broadcaster RTVE reports .


Brech will leave Barcelona at 15:00 hrs on Wednesday and will be accompanied by Interpol staff.

It is not known where Brech will land in the Netherlands and to which prison he will be taken. The Public Prosecution Service does not want to give any further details.
"We won't say anything about his extradition," according to a spokesman. "As soon as he is in the Netherlands, we will send out a press release."

BBM


Good. There has been a lot of speculation in the media about what might happen to him in prison, and if certain lawyers are willing to take up his defense and so on, blablabla. There are times when I don't feel like translating because I'd be wasting my time. What are they expecting? to get tickets for the interrogation? Leave the man in peace and let the experts do their work. This case is complicated enough as it is, and it is not a done deal, not at all.
 
@ZaZara My heart goes out to you, friend. What an amazing amount of work. You can tell that you care so much for this case, this family and most of all, for this little boy. I have read everything you posted and I’ll have to put together my thoughts. It’s so very sad. And the investigator who pushed to have his family members tested, to get a 100% match...a big pat on the back to him or her!
 
Another detail: everyone is wondering which traces of Jos Brech have been found. One of the few who writes about this is Gerlof Leistra from Elsevier, who says that it is grip marks. The clothes of Nicky - underpants and pajama pants - are - it seems - with some force pulled out by someone else. These are the perpetrators of which Jos is being looked for. That is also the most plausible and perhaps even sufficient as evidence for a conviction.
Mick van der Laan en Jos Brech: zoek (en) de verschillen – Misdaadjournalist Hendrik Jan Korterink: over achtergronden misdaad!
 
Conviction in the Nicky Verstappen case requires more than a simple DNA hit

The interrogation of the suspect of Nicky Verstappen's death in 1998, who was arrested in Spain, will be crucial. Without a confession, the true facts will always remain a mystery.

The manhunt with the help of civilians and the media for the suspect of the death in 1998 of eleven-year-old Nicky Verstappen seemed like a desperate attempt, but it has yielded surprisingly quick results. There will be no conviction, however, if 55-year-old suspect Jos Brech, detained on Sunday in Spain, does not confess.

Brech came into the picture as a suspect after a DNA match, but this match is only the beginning of the investigation. For the sleuths in white coats of the Netherlands Forensic Institute, this is an iron law. A complete match between two DNA profiles is not enough for a conviction: there may be another explanation for the presence of DNA.

It is understandable that on Wednesday 22 August the police and the judiciary spoke of a breakthrough in the investigation. Brech's name and photo were made public at a press conference. His DNA corresponds to 'suspicious traces' on Nicky's clothes. These are not sperm, but grip traces. Chief Public Prosecutor Jan Eland: 'We are a lot closer to the truth. The suspicious traces we have don't lie, but they don't tell the whole story.'


BBM

The remainder of this report by Gerlof Leistra is behind a paywall, but what we can read is pretty clear:

The traces of Jos Brech were discovered on the clothes that Nicky was wearing when he was found (underpants, pyjama trousers), and they are grip traces.

HJ Korterink writes that Nicky's clothes - underpants and pyjama pants - were - so it seems - pulled off by someone else with some force. I can't find that conclusion in the part that is visible of Leistra's report. Until we know more, is it also possible that the traces were left when the clothes were pulled on (indtead of off)?


Traces of two other men have been found. These men have not been identified. DNA od one person was found on a cigarette stub nearby nad and the location of the other traces has not been made public (as far as I'm aware).
 
@ZaZara I know for that reading Elsevier
articles you have to pay but even when you have a payed subscribtion I do wonder if you can post the link of the article because its not visible for public

I did found it interesting that HJ Korterink (crime reporter) mentioned it about the grip dna traces from the source of Elseviers crime reporter (G.Leistra) on Nicky's underwear and pyama
The rest of the media is IMO more about c&p
Thats why I posted it here to discuss



As for the other two DNA traces,I dont recall during the announcment of the Press Conference that one DNA trace included a ciragette bud
Even so,it did seem that the location where Nicky's body was found was a well know meeting place for gays
Do you have a source/ link for that? (Ciragette bud/DNA)

The DNAdatabank.wordpress that a WB member posted earlier in this topic,showed how many mistakes the investigatores made and those 20 years should/could be prevented?
It seems like a lot of forensic evidence got lost

The campleader Barten did know about the sexplace,close to the crimescene and told the police about it,without questioning

I still think he was involved somehow
 
My tablet battery is low but from the website
De moord op Nicky Verstappen

1998
"There has been no sperm on the clothes or on the body of the victim. Hairs found in the slip are most likely from Nicky herself. There are two tracks from which a limited DNA profile can be made. From this it can only be concluded in 1998 that this profile comes from someone of the male sex, nothing more. It is not known which traces are involved. At the secret sex place near the crime scene, a tissue and a cigarette bud are found with DNA traces. A complete profile that is directly generated by the national database; that does not result in a match."
 
@ZaZara I know for that reading Elsevier
articles you have to pay but even when you have a payed subscribtion I do wonder if you can post the link of the article because its not visible for public

I did found it interesting that HJ Korterink (crime reporter) mentioned it about the grip dna traces from the source of Elseviers crime reporter (G.Leistra) on Nicky's underwear and pyama
The rest of the media is IMO more about c&p
Thats why I posted it here to discuss



As for the other two DNA traces,I dont recall during the announcment of the Press Conference that one DNA trace included a ciragette bud
Even so,it did seem that the location where Nicky's body was found was a well know meeting place for gays
Do you have a source/ link for that? (Ciragette bud/DNA)

The DNAdatabank.wordpress that a WB member posted earlier in this topic,showed how many mistakes the investigatores made and those 20 years should/could be prevented?
It seems like a lot of forensic evidence got lost

The campleader Barten did know about the sexplace,close to the crimescene and told the police about it,without questioning

I still think he was involved somehow


I do not know what was said during the press conference. It is general knowledge and has been for years that a cigarette stub was found in the area near the body. It was tested for DNA but there was no match with any known person.

I translate MSM sources that may or may not be behind paywalls. There is nothing I can do about that, often an article is availabe to the public for a few hours or days and then it disappears. If an article is available in Blendle, I sometimes use my Blendle account.
BTW in older threads, many links to the original sources are no longer working.
 
I do remember that during the PC it was said that that they were still looking for 2 other DNA profiles and that it was still going to be investigated
I did watch and listen to it again the day after and posted it on another forum
Have to digg it up ...dont know exactly where and wich forum it was
 
2004
With the ever-improving DNA techniques, more information can probably be extracted from the blood splints that were found on pajama pants in 2000. Developments were also startling in research into DNA profiles based on contact traces (wear and tear, grip marks and touch marks). In other cases, ground-breaking results were also achieved.
The DNA profile from the sex site in the cornfield is sent to our neighboring countries for inclusion in their DNA database. Who knows, this might lead to a match one day.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
3,048
Total visitors
3,167

Forum statistics

Threads
602,287
Messages
18,138,375
Members
231,309
Latest member
lbustam1
Back
Top