That was not my thought at all.
Thank you.
I'm sure that after you have read the book "Twin Connections" you are more of an expert than I, because I am merely, but a twin...but I assure you, her father did not react for a very real reason and I suspect that reason was that NC was prone to exaggeration....
No, I think that you misunderstood or I could have been clearer, perhaps. The comment on my post was just MY thought, which is just another way of saying IMO, JMHO etc.
I am not at all an expert and have only responded to your comments on the 'twin bond'. I have already said that I do not understand the 'twin bond'. I have not read the book that I referred to, only the abstract, which supports your insight: you are the expert. I do think that the 'twin bond' and your comments on the issue are very interesting!
However, if you accept that the twin bond should be accepted in one instance/situation, then that applies across the board according to logic. Similiarily, the distinction that you made (twins may overreact to protect a twin, so the bond factor does not always translate to truth about a given situation) would also apply across the board, and MAY apply to why GR did not initially take it seriously. I have no idea. I am using your arguments.
I personally think that KL is telling the truth, but that is just my humble opinion.
As far as the exaggeration issue goes, I have already responded to that in my post above on Canadian sarcasm. I am sure that GR has a Great Sense of Humour (GSOH) too.