Wednesday80
Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2013
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 22
And the route we 'thought' she took home... well... she didn't make it home, so therefore eliminate that route! Eliminate the phone call!
Just crazy. There's gotta be cameras at the shopping center... gotta be!!! So if she was seen at point A, and not at point B...then it would give an area of where she disappeared.
I cannot believe they waited a full week to tell us she didn't go home! UGH!!!
If LE wants people to have faith in them, they best start telling the truth! If a suspicious activity occurred, but people believed it couldn't have been about Abigail because she was at home during that time... well,... see how it could change things? And the people that were there for the fall foliage... bet they are gone now! So if they saw something, and figured "nah, couldn't be then"... well too late for that tip!
And if this had been a family member or friend changing the story, our 'hinky meters' would be exploding!!! Either give correct information, or if you found the information has changed since your first theory, at least let people know that. Hey we thought the dogs were following her path home, however she walked home the day before so the dogs could have picked up that trail, etc. People are hanging on to each word because they've released so little to us. And sadly, they might not have much more to release. I pray I'm wrong. Would LOVE to have crow stew for supper tonight.
Jmo... which amounts to nothing... sigh
I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume we should rule out the route simply because she didn't make it home. She still could have headed home along her normal route or for that matter, along any number of routes that are off the beaten path that could still get her home and that may be a "normal" route for her.
Per the release that she never made it home, it may not be a case of LE lying to the public or keeping that info from the public. I understand the frustration with that based on past cases but assuming that and/or getting frustrated about it doesn't help find Abigail, it can be pursued later, if need be, if it is determined to be a significant "dropped ball" point of contention.
Some assumptions we are all prone to make based on past cases can lead us astray in a current case. Also, it's important to remember that exclusion of one scenario doesn't mean automatic inclusion of another; correlation does not equal causation.
Btw- I really enjoy your posts, thank you for them.