Well, I (for one) have not!
Afterall, I've seen up close and personal myself, how a little band of supposed intellects can get together to blacklist someone.
It happens all the time, actually.
I liked the closing Note to Mr. Renner, from a reader, (not moderator) Dec. 2009; who thanks him for the tireless work he did on
the Amy M. case, and Krista H. case (signed
Boy of the Water) apparently a fan of Mr. Renner's work. Often it's the voice of the minority we should be listening to, as oftentimes as in this case, the majority rule on someone is quite biased as they belong to the same "club"
I don't think trying to put down Mr. Renner personally is in any way helpful towards a finding more through free association and free speech what in the world happened to this young woman.
I've not seen where his Blog points fingers in any menacing way at all. Actually, when we read the entire Entries, we see that Mr. Renner has agreed
with the editors (under Suspect List)......and the discussion between them was resolved at that point, (later being resumed on other grounds however)......
Since he (the author) is not "banned" per se from Wikipedia or editing, I see no reason to find such fault with him overall.
A difference of opinion perhaps,..........but then, everyone has opinions. My husband (for instance) finds a lot of fault with writer Ann Rule, yet she writes prolifically about all manner of true crime cases, albeit with "a certain amount of creative license with the truth". Her books cuase us to examine a little more
closely, her more cavalier statements, as to whether they are factual or conjecture on her part.
Overall, unless someone is named as a suspect, I don't think we should "name names".....perhaps only initials as they do here.
But what does this have to do with the Maura Murray case anyway....
:fence: