oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,707
Copy of Will at link..
Colts Neck murders: Baseless to say inheritance was motive for Caneiro killing: attorneys
Defense attorneys for Paul Caneiro, the man accused of murdering his brother, sister-in-law and their young children last month, said Monday that there is no basis to suggest that inheriting his brother's fortune was a motive in the killing.
Snip
But Paul Caneiro's defense attorneys, Robert A. Honecker Jr. and Mitchell J. Ansell, said their client would only have been managing the estate as executor and would not have inherited his brother's wealth. The attorneys said Keith Caneiro, 50, had also been named executor of Paul and his wife's wills.
Snip
"As administrators of the wills they were not beneficiaries. To suggest this was a motive to commit these horrific crimes is simply without any basis."
Snip
Paul Caneiro never took as executor of his brother's estate. His attorneys confirmed Friday that he agreed to renounce his claim and Cesar Caneiro indicated he would be willing to assume the role.
But the process has been put on hold after Jennifer Caneiro's mother Bette Karidis filed an objection to the will in probate court. Control over the estate will now likely be settled in state Superior Court, Monmouth County Surrogate Rosemarie Peters told the Press.
Humm. Imo the defense lawyer speaks with very forked tongue. Surprise! Surprise!
Didn't this same attorney say he WASN'T going to try this case in the media???
Yet since it happened he is the very one who has yapped to the media several times.
It shows how disingenuous defense attorneys are and explains why they are so detested.
Of course he's trying to try the case in the media! He knows its the prosecutors who don't try their cases in media and do so in a courtroom where it should be.
So he uses this to his advantagange like so many others before him have done.
He is very aware he can say anything...even lie...when he is outside the well of the courtroom.
Imo another mouthy Mark Garegos who tried to sway public opinion about Scott Peterson being 'stone cold innocent' and constantly talking to the press.
The only thing he said then that was truthful was two of his uttered BS words. 'Stone cold.' MG never has found a microphone he didn't like and this one sounds a lot like him. One who likes the media attention. He is already trying to sway the potential jury pool.
It's just the same old tired spin that have been used in other cases like this.
He knows the Will is going to be damaging evidence against his client and that is the very reason he is already trying to diminish its weight.
He is desperate like someone putting their fingers in a leaking water dike. Soon he will run out of fingers and toes to stop the dike from breaking. Lol.
He is pretending that is all the state has when he knows they have much much more. The Will will be one piece of CE combined with a voluminous amount of other evidence all against his client.
So the prosecutor quietly sits back gathering more and more evidence against Paul.
I imagine he knows at some point the presiding judge is going to put a gag order in place.
Imo