Ok, thankyou for responding Lightning Jack,
your above points are all reasonable. I do disagree with some thoughts, such as the autopsy not finding a COD. I realise it was said that it was not ascertained. My opinion on this is that it may be being withheld by either family request, or some other reason? However, I don't think this is neither here nor there in relation to GBC. the fact is she is as dead as anyone can be. SHE IS DEAD AND SOMETHING CAUSED IT
Secondly, a lot of the evidence is circumstantial, yes. But IMO, seasoned detectives have incredibly astute instincts and did not stumble out of 20 weeks at Police Recruit Training Camp, so they know what they are looking for. For me, the pieces of the puzzle are falling into place quickly and logically, but I am also of the belief that there is a chance he will be found innocent, but more specifically, I do believe there is a chance (about 0.000000005%, that he is in fact innocent)
You may not have been here long, but I think if you ask anyone, you will find that I struggled very very much with the thought he was guilty...sometimes I fought tooth and nail to try and find anything that could show his innocence. So Im not narrow minded, or heartless.
As for the financial aspect, I feel opposite to you, and think he was in trouble. My thoughts on this are he's always been in trouble yet manages to 'luck' himself through each dilemna...just my opinion
again, thanks for responding in a courteous way
just one other thing...I think that although you have mentioned your 'for' arguments, you have avoided many of the 'against' ones, that, IMO, cant be ignored