neesaki
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 16,064
- Reaction score
- 49,611
Hi my N!
Originally Posted by neesaki
So, regarding the second video: the "grooming" thing starts around 1:08 in the video which is about 5:26 PM. The person in the Toyota FJ cruiser is there to do the grooming, first, with the guy with blondish hair in the white shirt and pants. Then he leaves and around 1:33 in the video which is around 5:32 pm the guy in the plaid shirt and a baseball cap shows up to be "groomed". Any idea who works for the FBI or the government that wears a plaid shirt and a baseball cap?..... Throughout that time and before , there are numerous black SUV's, those are black Chevrolet Suburbans or Tahoes, not sure which. I'm sure someone here has a better eye for vehicles ?
So, the question is, what's going on? And why? I guess one can only speculate. I did the times rather quickly so if I'm off please correct me. But I am curious about this video. Do we know where it was shot from, as in where are the cameras located ?
Another thing, when watching the video, there seems to be some times that are not accounted for? As in, there is nothing and then there are suddenly people ? Idk, but there seems to be some parts cut out ? Could someone else watch and tell me I'm not crazy ? LOL!
ETA:
I hope it's ok to be discussing these videos, if so , THANK YOU TRICIA!
It is CCTV! Videos I watch and have posted are eye witness recordings in real time as the events unfolded! On this tradegy all I have done the past 90 days or so is watch eyewitness videos and draw my own conclusions!!
I cant imagine why cell phone video of any event would be a problem posting and discussing. It is the most authentic representation of what transpired??
There are no theories , thoughts, narratives on the stuff I have watched!
We have used CCTV when available on any thread here.
We saw mostly on cell phones -- I never how on this one only it became CT - its video!
Just a quick recall we have used eyewitness video on some threads like"
paris terrorists in the streets yelling
tampa serial killer
missing cases last know surveillance
plane crash video
recordings of 911 calls
video inside batman theatre
inside james holmes house
pictures of garage in austin case
CCTV of him leaving the restaurant
inside the church shooting
video of Charleville (car hitting people)
cell phone of Battica stuff in Paris
video of Nice truck plowing through crowds cell phone
CCTV eyewitness video of Germany truck plowing cell phone
Dallas cop shooting cell phone
body cams dash cams
jewish deli being stormed
Imo only on this tragedy everything got blurred on the other threads is because there was no media coverage -- and since we all are into MSM verification . The words YT, erroneously imply CT-- everywhere.
Because media vanished we had to get our video from YT. IMO the generalized notion , for those who feel YT is all CT is that images are manipulated (and can be).
In this tragedy, however, I came to the conclusion that cell phone video that was being uploaded on YT in real time, while people are fleeing from a barrage of machine gun bullets are not editing or altering their video while running!
There is not time to falsify their cell phone video - it was all real time -- thousands were posted on YT in the first 180 minutes while it is all going on.
I have trust in what my eyes are seeing in real time !
I then trust it is ok, through time, to have questions that contradict what my eyes have seen , what I hear, what I think and compare and contrast what I saw and heard LE stating.
When they become increasingly conflicted it results in my questioning what I see and what they say.
It has really been that simple. I found stuff odd from the beginning but I certainly did not come to where I am today instantly - or in several weeks actually.
It has been slow, anger producing, insulting to common sense, contradictory to our core beliefs as American that public officials have a duty to inform the public. Our whole society is based on that.
THe media vanishing is nothing other than very concerning. I tried in the beginning to tell myself that with rapid news cycles it might go quicker than it did 20 years ago - but three pressers in the worlds ( I think the only one worldwide that was worse was Norway) worst mass shooting or terrorist attack is not ok.
There have to be reasons for this. It is not typical, it is not what we stand for as it relates to freedom of the press and its role in our society. Lombardo deciding to have cops and decide who is allowed inside the few pressers there were IMO is no OK. Violates our first amendment.
The statement a few posts back take for what it is worth is more than indicative that something very wrong is going on here. It is appalling.
To be both respectful and frank - it totally blows my mind the speed at which many came to the sole shooter is confusing to me .
I do think some of my confusion as it relates to us on this tragedy we usually can give each other alternatives to our beliefs and conclusions.
At a deep level I would really like challenges to my conclusions from what I have seen -- because my conclusions are scary- it does not feel safe when government are keeping secrets from those they serve...................
Re: bolded: Yes, this!
