Controlling men do not live next door to inlaws. And you are basing "controlling" from rumors. It is not factual information.
I apologise all, I'm on my phone and on the move so quotes might get screwy!
I would like to see some stats please, about the likelihood of a controlling man living next to his in-laws. I'm sorry but I don't see why this would be the case.
Of course he knew about tracking the phone. And your comment of a day and a half transpired is also incorrect.
<Mod snip>
The official time of Jennifer's missing was reported via 9-1-1 by her husband to the PD on the phone. Her father didn't want GR to phone 9-1-1. He didn't want police involved. He wanted to wait it out for her to come home. Because she was not answering text messages or phone calls during the day...GR was getting desperate and worried.
Finally, GR decided he didn't care what his father in law wanted...he was calling. He phoned 9-1-1 at 8pm. The pinging of the phone would not locate the device. It was in the morning, less than 12 hours later the pinging finally traced to the phone.
When Jennifer wasnt answering texts or calls (plural, presumably, from the wording, which implies to me people trying to get in touch with her)
a) did people have any idea why this would be?
b) was this at all common?
c) was GR the only person who tried?
d) had they had an argument?
Also.
1. For GR and his father-in-law to have had a back and forth and 'finally' GR to call the police at 8pm, I'm guessing there was a
clear sign, quite early on, that something was not right. Would this be a correct guess?
2. Why did GR wait til the morning to track the phone, particularly if he was so sure that something was amiss.
Sorry if this post sounds shorttempered- iPhone typing does that to me!